Judges
Madras High Court

Justice K.Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Madras High Court · 2024–2026
13 judgments in the LexStreak library · 13 with headnotes
OSA No. 315 of 201931 Jul 2026
Vedanta Limited v. Masyc Projects Pvt Ltd
The Madras High Court, in an Original Side Appeal against an order under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upheld the Arbitrator's findings on commissioning of a…
Arbitration
LPA.18/202630 Jul 2026
V-Guard Industries Limited v. M/s.Kangaro Industries
A Division Bench of the Madras High Court held that Rule 45 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 is mandatory: an opponent who does not file evidence in support of opposition, or intimate…
IP / Trademarks
OSA No. 78 of 201928 Jul 2026
Shanmugavelli v. R. Panchavarnam
Hearing rival claims by two women each asserting to be the widow of a deceased government servant, the Madras High Court held that a customary divorce dissolving the appellant's earlier…
Family / MatrimonialProperty / Land
OSA(CAD).3/202228 Jul 2026
N.RANGA RAO AND SONS PRIVATE LTD v. SREEE ANNAPOORNA AGRO FOODS
A Division Bench of the Madras High Court allowed in part the appeal of the owner of the CYCLE agarbathi mark and restrained a trader from selling edible oils under the identical mark,…
IP / TrademarksCivil Procedure / CPC
OSA No. 70 of 202628 Jul 2026
Punjab and Sind Bank v. M/s.Dewa properties Ltd
A Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed an original side appeal against the refusal of specific performance of a 99 years sale cum lease deed, holding that offer and acceptance…
Property / Land
C.S.No.259 of 201728 Jul 2026
N.Ranga Rao & Sons Private Ltd v. Sree Annapoorna Agro Foods
The Madras High Court partly allowed an Original Side Appeal and held that the trademark “CYCLE”, in continuous use for incense sticks since 1954, had acquired substantial reputation and…
IP / TrademarksCivil Procedure / CPC
OSA.38/202127 Jul 2026
M/S.HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LTD v. M/S.ST.ANTONYS CARS PVT LTD
A Division Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a car manufacturer's Section 37 appeal and set aside most of an arbitral award in a dealer's favour, holding that the Emden formula,…
Arbitration
O.S.A.Nos.182,109,110,112,113,151,161,162,190 & 209 of 202522 Jul 2026
C.M.P.Nos.6917, 6986, 7009, 7039, 9395, 9723, 9759, 11626, 12068 & v. B.Rajyalakshmi 1st Respondent in
The Division Bench set aside an arbitral award enhancing land acquisition compensation for lands acquired for a Koyambedu grade separator, holding that the Arbitrator, after an earlier…
ArbitrationProperty / Land
O.S.A.No.30 of 202021 Jul 2026
M/s. V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
The Madras High Court partly allowed the Port Trust's appeal against dismissal of its Section 34 challenge, holding that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the…
Arbitration
2025:MHC:297316 Dec 2025
ANTOINE & BECOUEREL ORGANIC v. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
The Madras High Court held that the wide power of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 129-B of the Customs Act, 1962 extends only to the grounds of appeal…
Taxation
2024:MHC:355919 Sept 2024
SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD v. L.SOFIA PARVIN
A Division Bench of the Madras High Court (Commercial Appellate Division) refused to condone a 206-day delay in a finance company's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and…
Arbitration
2024:MHC:322630 Aug 2024
FATIMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA
The Madras High Court quashed, prospectively, the MoEF Office Memoranda of 19.02.2021 and 07.07.2021 that provided for ex post facto environmental clearance, holding that such executive…
Writ / Public Law
2024:MHC:298515 Jul 2024
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S.URC CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD
The Madras High Court's Commercial Appellate Division set aside a Section 34 order that had modified an arbitral award and remanded the matter for a fresh Section 34 hearing, holding that…
Arbitration
This page lists the judgments of Justice K.Govindarajan Thilakavadi that LexStreak holds. It is not a complete record of the judge’s work, and LexStreak publishes nothing about the judge beyond what the Court’s own record carries. All judges