LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 15 March 2024

2024 INSC 209

2024 INSC 209 · Writ Petition (Civil) No 880 of 2017
Full text of the Supreme Court of India's judgmentChecked against the originalFree to read
🔖 Save this judgment📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.

🔖Save judgments into folders you actually use
📚A daily feed curated to your practice areas
🔥A reading streak, and your place on the Bar leaderboard
Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Full judgment

2024 INSC 209

Reportable

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Miscellaneous Application Diary No 11805 of 2024 In Miscellaneous Application No 486 of 2024 In Writ Petition (Civil) No 880 of 2017

Association of Democratic Reforms and Another …Petitioner(s)

Versus

Union of India and Others …Respondent(s)

ORDER

1 An application has been filed by the Election Commission of India 1 seeking further

directions.

Sanjay Kumar 1 “ECI”

2 In the order of this Court dated 11 March 2024, this Court had directed that ECI shall

upload on its website the data furnished to this Court in compliance with the interim

order dated 12 April 2019 which was being maintained in the custody of this Court.

While issuing this direction, the Court has presumed that a copy of the data which

was lodged before the Registry of this Court would be available with the ECI.

3 Mr Amit Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of the ECI states that, as a matter of

fact, ECI did not retain a copy of the data which was collated by it since it was being

placed before this Court in sealed custody.

4 The request, therefore, of the ECI is that the data which was filed before this Court be

returned to it to enable it to comply with the order of this Court for uploading all the

documents. This request of the ECI has not been opposed by Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr

Vijay Hansaria, senior counsel and Mr Prashant Bhushan, counsel for the petitioners.

5 We accordingly issue the following directions:

(i) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court shall ensure that the data which has

been filed by ECI in pursuance of the interim orders of this Court is scanned

and digitized. This may be carried out preferably by 5 pm tomorrow (16

March 2024);

(ii) Once the above exercise is completed, the originals shall be returned to

Mr Amit Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of ECI;

(iii) ECI shall then upload the data on its website on or before 5 pm on 17

March 2024; and

(iv) A copy of the scanned and digitized files shall also be made available to

Mr Amit Sharma to obviate the replication of the process of digitization.

6 The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.

7 The judgment of the Constitution Bench in Association for Democratic Reforms vs

Union of India 2 required the State Bank of India 3 to furnish to the ECI all details of the

Electoral Bonds purchased, and, as the case may, redeemed by political parties,

including the date of purchase/redemption, name of the purchaser and the

denomination of the Electoral Bond purchased. It has been submitted that SBI has not

disclosed the alpha-numeric numbers of the Electoral Bonds.

8 The Solicitor General of India submits that since he is not appearing for SBI, notice may

be issued to it.

9 We direct the Registry to issue notice to SBI, returnable on 18 March 2024. Additionally,

we also direct the presence of a Senior Officer of SBI who is responsible for the

management and storage of details of Bonds purchased and redeemed on the next

date of hearing.

2 Writ Petition (Civil) No 880 of 2017 3 “SBI”

10 A copy of this order shall be served by the Registrar (Judicial) on Mr Sanjay Kapur,

Standing Counsel for SBI.

…..…… .....…...….......…………………..CJI. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

…..…….…....…........……………….…........J. [Sanjiv Khanna]

………….…....…........……………….…........J. [B R Gavai]

………....…....…........……………….…........J. [J B Pardiwala]

……..…...…....…........……………….…........J. [Manoj Misra]

New Delhi; March 15, 2024 CKB

What the Court decided this week

Can a plaint be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when limitation is a mixed question?

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 14807 OF 2024 · Supreme Court of India

Must stray dogs removed from schools and hospitals be released back to the same location?

2025 INSC 1357 · Supreme Court of India

Are the Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 binding on a State Government issuing an aggregator licence?

2023 INSC 102 · Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court decides something every day. Read one a day.

A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.

Start reading free
Source: Supreme Court of India. Reproduced for open access to public legal records, as issued — we add no masking of our own.
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy