LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 12 February 2024

AXIS BANK LIMITED APPLICANT/ v. NAREN SHETH & ANR. NON- /

2024 INSC 105 · CIVIL APPEAL NO.2085 OF 2022
Coram: Justice Vikram Nath · Justice Satish Chandra Sharma · Justice Ranjana Shailey
Full text of the Supreme Court of India's judgmentChecked against the originalFree to read
🔖 Save this judgment📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.

🔖Save judgments into folders you actually use
📚A daily feed curated to your practice areas
🔥A reading streak, and your place on the Bar leaderboard
Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Full judgment
1.

Delay condoned.

2.

This application is filed by the applicant- appellant seeking clarification of the judgment dated 12.09.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4.

The word "unsecured creditor" referred to in paragraph 20 of the judgment be now read as "secured creditor". Neetu Khajuria 5. Judgment dated 12.09.2023 is corrected to the above extent only. 2 5. Miscellaneous application is disposed of accordingly. ....................,J. (VIKRAM NATH) ....................,J. (SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA)

NEW DELHI

JANUARY 19, 2024 3 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 50249/2023 AXIS BANK LIMITED Applicant(s)

VERSUS

NAREN SHETH & ANR. Respondent(s) (IA No. 250944/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION AND IA No. 262948/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 19-01-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, AOR Mr. Akash Khurana, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Sharma, AOR Mr. Surya Prakash, Adv. Ms. Megha Karnwal, AOR Mr. Arjun Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv. Ms. Mahima Kapur, Adv. Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay condoned. Miscellaneous application is disposed of in terms of the signed reportable order. (NEETU KHAJURIA) (RANJANA SHAILEY) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (Signed reportable order is placed on the file.)

What the Court decided this week

Can a plaint be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when limitation is a mixed question?

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 14807 OF 2024 · Supreme Court of India

Must stray dogs removed from schools and hospitals be released back to the same location?

2025 INSC 1357 · Supreme Court of India

Are the Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 binding on a State Government issuing an aggregator licence?

2023 INSC 102 · Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court decides something every day. Read one a day.

A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.

Start reading free
Source: Supreme Court of India. Reproduced for open access to public legal records, as issued — we add no masking of our own.
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy