LexStreak
Read free →
Constitutional Law★ Landmark
Supreme Court of India

Dinesh Trivedi, M.P. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

By Anvikshiki · LexStreak Legal Desk · Published · Judgment delivered
(1997) 4 SCC 306 · 20 March 1997
Coram: Justice A.M. Ahmadi · Justice S.V. Manohar
Full text of the Supreme Court of India's judgmentChecked against the originalFree to read
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art. 19(1)(a) Constitution of In…📬 Get today's judgments
Headnotes

Constitution of India -- Art. 19(1)(a) -- citizens' right to know -- not an absolute right --

Source of the right to know -- Held: The right of citizens to know about the affairs and functioning of Government can be traced to the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a), since an informed citizenry and free flow of information are essential to meaningful public debate and the working of a democracy.

The right is not absolute -- Held further: Like every other fundamental freedom, the citizens' right to know is not absolute; it carries recognised limitations. Where disclosure would have serious repercussions on public security or would compromise the effective functioning of intelligence and investigative agencies, or would unfairly expose persons named in unverified material, the Government may legitimately decline disclosure notwithstanding the general right to information.

Application to the Vohra Committee Report -- Held further: On the facts, the Court declined to direct disclosure of the raw intelligence inputs underlying the Vohra Committee's report on the nexus between crime syndicates and public life, but directed the Union Government to place the substance of the report and the action taken before Parliament, and to give serious thought to institutional mechanisms for independently examining and acting on such reports in future.

Headnote & Points of Law

You've used your free headnotes this month

The Court's judgment is below in full, free, as always — that never changes. What needs an account is LexStreak's own work on it: the headnote, the questions this judgment settles, and the passages that decide them. A free account opens all of it again.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Acts & Sections
Article 19, Constitution of IndiaArt. 19(1)(a) Constitution of India
What the Court decided this week

Is non-payment of a part of the sale price a ground for cancellation of a registered Sale Deed once title has passed?

2020 INSC 450 · Supreme Court of India

Does the burden to prove that property is joint property of a Hindu Undivided Family lie on the person who alleges it?

2020 INSC 327 · Supreme Court of India

Can a confession statement be used to frame charges against an accused in the absence of any other evidence?

CRL RC.2194/2023 · Madras High Court

The Supreme Court and the Madras High Court decide something every day. Read one a day.

A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.

Start reading free

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's and the Madras High Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.

🔖Save judgments into folders you actually use
✍️Highlights and notes that follow you to every device
📚A daily feed curated to your practice areas
🔥A reading streak, and your place on the Bar leaderboard
Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Source: Supreme Court of India. Reproduced for open access to public legal records, as issued — we add no masking of our own.
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy