Dinesh Trivedi, M.P. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Constitution of India -- Art. 19(1)(a) -- citizens' right to know -- not an absolute right --
Source of the right to know -- Held: The right of citizens to know about the affairs and functioning of Government can be traced to the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a), since an informed citizenry and free flow of information are essential to meaningful public debate and the working of a democracy.
The right is not absolute -- Held further: Like every other fundamental freedom, the citizens' right to know is not absolute; it carries recognised limitations. Where disclosure would have serious repercussions on public security or would compromise the effective functioning of intelligence and investigative agencies, or would unfairly expose persons named in unverified material, the Government may legitimately decline disclosure notwithstanding the general right to information.
Application to the Vohra Committee Report -- Held further: On the facts, the Court declined to direct disclosure of the raw intelligence inputs underlying the Vohra Committee's report on the nexus between crime syndicates and public life, but directed the Union Government to place the substance of the report and the action taken before Parliament, and to give serious thought to institutional mechanisms for independently examining and acting on such reports in future.
Headnote & Points of Law
You've used your free headnotes this month
The Court's judgment is below in full, free, as always — that never changes. What needs an account is LexStreak's own work on it: the headnote, the questions this judgment settles, and the passages that decide them. A free account opens all of it again.
Create my free accountFree forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India
Is non-payment of a part of the sale price a ground for cancellation of a registered Sale Deed once title has passed?
2020 INSC 450 · Supreme Court of India
Does the burden to prove that property is joint property of a Hindu Undivided Family lie on the person who alleges it?
2020 INSC 327 · Supreme Court of India
Can a confession statement be used to frame charges against an accused in the absence of any other evidence?
CRL RC.2194/2023 · Madras High Court
The Supreme Court and the Madras High Court decide something every day. Read one a day.
A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.
Start reading freeOne judgment a day. That's the whole habit.
LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's and the Madras High Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.
Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy