LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 20 November 2024

SIDDIQUE v. STATE OF KERALA & ANR

2024 INSC 877 · CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.4625 OF 2024
Coram: Justice Bela M. Trivedi · Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
Full text of the Supreme Court of India's judgmentChecked against the originalFree to read
🔖 Save this judgment📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.

🔖Save judgments into folders you actually use
📚A daily feed curated to your practice areas
🔥A reading streak, and your place on the Bar leaderboard
Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Full judgment
1.

Leave granted.

2.

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.09.2024, passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Bail Application No.7331 of 2024, rejecting the said application filed by the appellant – accused seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with the F.I.R. being Crime No.1192 of 2024 dated 27.08.2024 registered at Police Station Museum, District Thiruvananthapuram City, for the offence under Sections 376 and 506 IPC.

3.

Heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties at length. 2

4.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned senior counsels for the parties and perusing the documents on record including the pleadings, we deem it appropriate not to assign elaborate reasons, particularly considering the sensitivity of the case. However, considering the fact that the complainant had lodged the complaint almost eight years after the alleged incident, which had taken place in 2016 and the fact that she had also posted the post on facebook somewhere in 2018, making allegations against about 14 people, including the appellant with regard to the alleged sexual abuse, as also the fact that she had not gone to the Justice Hema Committee constituted by the High Court of Kerala for ventilating her grievance, we are inclined to accept the present appeal, subject to certain conditions mentioned hereinafter.

5.

In that view of the matter, it is directed that in the event of arrest of appellant in connection with the F.I.R. being Crime No.1192 of 2024 dated 27.08.2024 registered at Police Station Museum, District Thiruvananthapuram City, for the offence under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, he shall be released on bail, subject to the conditions that may be 3 imposed by the Trial Court, including the condition that the appellant shall deposit the passport before the Trial Court and shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in carrying out the investigation.

6.

It is needless to say that any breach of the conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court for releasing him on bail, shall entail cancellation of the bail.

7.

Subject to the afore-stated, the present appeal stands allowed.

8.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ......................J. (BELA M. TRIVEDI) ......................J. (SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA) NEW DELHI; 19TH NOVEMBER, 2024.

What the Court decided this week

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. versus M/S. HARESHWAR ENTERPRISES (P) LTD. & ORS.

2021 INSC 412 · Supreme Court of India

THE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNING BODY DAULAT RAM COLLEGE versus DR. ASHA & ORS.

2021 INSC 8 · Supreme Court of India

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LIMITED versus AMBUJ A. KASLIWAL & ORS.

2021 INSC 90 · Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court decides something every day. Read one a day.

A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.

Start reading free
Source: Supreme Court of India. Reproduced for open access to public legal records, as issued — we add no masking of our own.
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy