Is a college entitled to the same relief granted in an earlier similar case?
Pharmacy Act, 1948 — Recognition and Affiliation — Pharmacy Council of India Approval — Conditional Affiliation on Similar Facts —
Pharmacy Act, 1948 — PCI Approval — Relief Following an Earlier Similar Case —
Held: Where the Pharmacy Council of India has approved a college's intake capacity and the State Government has granted conditional affiliation after considering the recommendations of the Affiliation Committee, and the facts are almost similar to an earlier writ petition already allowed by this Court, the petitioner colleges are entitled to the same relief. Held further: The University was directed to grant affiliation to the petitioner colleges for the Academic Year 2020-2021 and to permit their students to participate in the special examinations to be organized by the University. (¶9, 11)
Is a college entitled to the same relief granted in an earlier similar case?
Yes. With Pharmacy Council of India approval and State conditional affiliation in place, and facts almost similar to an earlier writ petition already allowed by this Court, the petitioner colleges were granted affiliation and permission for their students to sit the special examinations. [¶9, ¶11]
Prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment.
“1. Both these writ petitions filed by the petitioner – colleges seek various directions, including the direction to respondent No. 1 Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University (hereinafter referred to as “the University”), i.e, to comply with Notification dated 19.3.2021 issued by the State Government and grant conditional affiliation to the petitioner – colleges for Academic Year 20202021; direction directing the University to organize special examinations for B. Pharma students for Academic Year 20202021 in view of the aforesaid Notification dated 19.3.2021; and direction to the University to permit students of the petitioner – colleges to participate in the special examinations.”
“4. We find, that the facts in both the present writ petitions are almost similar to facts in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 decided by this Court on 15.4.2021. In both cases, grant of affiliation was denied by the University on the sole ground, that the timeline as prescribed by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) had lapsed.”
“9. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly finding that the facts in both the present cases are almost similar with the facts in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021, we are of the view that the present petitioners are also entitled to the same relief as is granted by this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021.”
“11. The writ petitions are allowed in the above terms.”
Headnote & Points of Law
You've used your free headnotes this month
The Court's judgment is below in full, free, as always — that never changes. What needs an account is LexStreak's own work on it: the headnote, the questions this judgment settles, and the passages that decide them. A free account opens all of it again.
Create my free accountFree forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India
Both these writ petitions filed by the petitioner – colleges seek various directions, including the direction to respondent No. 1 Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University (hereinafter referred to as “the University”), i.e, to comply with Notification dated 19.3.2021 issued by the State Government and grant conditional affiliation to the petitioner – colleges for Academic Year 20202021; direction directing the University to organize special examinations for B. Pharma students for Academic Year 20202021 in view of the aforesaid Notification dated 19.3.2021; and direction to the University to permit students of the petitioner – colleges to participate in the special examinations.
It is the contention of the petitioner – colleges that the facts in the present writ petitions are identical with the facts in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 (VIIT Pharmacy College and another vs. Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University and another)1, which was allowed by this Court vide order dated 15.4.2021.
Insofar as Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 is concerned, the University has not seriously disputed that the facts in the present writ petitions are similar to that in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021. However, it is the contention of the University, taken for the first time in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 448 of 2021 (Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy vs. Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University & Anr.), that the petitioner Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy did not participate in the counselling process and as such, is not entitled to any relief. Another ground that has been taken is, that there is a similar writ petition pending before the High Court filed by the petitioner Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy with regard to the same relief.
We find, that the facts in both the present writ petitions are almost similar to facts in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 decided by this Court on 15.4.2021. In both cases, grant of affiliation was denied by the University on the sole ground, that the timeline as prescribed by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) had lapsed.
It is also not in dispute, that vide Notification dated 19.3.2021, the State Government after considering the recommendations made by the Affiliation Committee has granted conditional affiliation to the petitioner colleges for admission in B. Pharma course in compliance with the order of the High Court passed in Writ Petition No.12536 of 2020.
The writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner – colleges since the University has refused to grant affiliation to the petitioner – colleges and to permit their students to appear for First Year B. Pharma examination.
This Court while allowing Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 has observed thus:
“9. This Court, in the case of, Dr. S.K. Toshiwal Educational Trusts Vidarbha Institute of Pharmacy (supra), has held as under: “87. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, it is held that in the field of Pharmacy Education and more particularly so far as the recognition of degrees and diplomas of Pharmacy Education is concerned, the Pharmacy Act, 1948 shall prevail. The norms and regulations set by the PCI and other specified authorities under the Pharmacy Act would have to be followed by the concerned institutions imparting education for degrees and diplomas in Pharmacy, including the norms and regulations with respect to increase and/or decrease in intake capacity of the students and the decisions of the PCI shall only be followed by the institutions imparting degrees and diplomas in Pharmacy. The questions are answered accordingly.” 10. Indisputably, in the present case, the PCI has granted approval to both the petitioners vide order dated 10th April 2020, with intake capacity of 100 and 60 admissions/students respectively. Not only that, the petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the policy decision of the State Government dated 15 th May 2020, have been allowed by the High Court vide judgment and order dated 9 th November 2020. Indisputably, the State Government also vide notification dated 19 th March 2021, has granted conditional affiliation after considering the recommendations made by the Affiliation Committee. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and particularly, taking into consideration, that the averments made on affidavit by the petitioners, are not controverted by the respondent No.1 University, we find that the petition deserves to be allowed.”
As in the aforesaid case decided by order dated 15.4.2021, in the present case also the approval has been granted by the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) on 10.4.2021 to both the petitioner – colleges with an intake capacity of 60 students each. The present petitioners have also filed the petitions challenging the policy decision of the State Government dated 15.5.2020 before the High Court and the same have been allowed by the High Court by judgments and orders dated 2.11.2020 and 10.11.2020. In the present case also, the State Government vide Notification dated 19.3.2021 has granted conditional affiliation after considering the recommendations made by the Affiliation Committee.
In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly finding that the facts in both the present cases are almost similar with the facts in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021, we are of the view that the present petitioners are also entitled to the same relief as is granted by this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021.
We are therefore inclined to allow the petitions in the following terms: The University is therefore directed to grant affiliation to the petitioner Colleges for the Academic Year 202021 and also permit the students of the petitioner Colleges to participate in the special examinations to be organized by the University for the Academic Year 202021 in view of the Notification dated 19th March 2021.
The writ petitions are allowed in the above terms. …..….......................J. [R.F. NARIMAN] .................................J. [K.M. JOSEPH] …….........................J. [B.R. GAVAI] NEW DELHI; JULY 06, 2021.
- 1.
2021 SCC Online SC 322 ↩
Is non-payment of a part of the sale price a ground for cancellation of a registered Sale Deed once title has passed?
2020 INSC 450 · Supreme Court of India
Does the burden to prove that property is joint property of a Hindu Undivided Family lie on the person who alleges it?
2020 INSC 327 · Supreme Court of India
Can a confession statement be used to frame charges against an accused in the absence of any other evidence?
CRL RC.2194/2023 · Madras High Court
The Supreme Court and the Madras High Court decide something every day. Read one a day.
A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.
Start reading freeOne judgment a day. That's the whole habit.
LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's and the Madras High Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.
Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy