LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 05 April 2022

UNION OF INDIA & ORS v. BHAGWAN DEEN & ANR

2022 INSC 392 · CIVIL APPEAL NO.2720 OF 2022
Coram: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit · Justice S. Ravindra Bhat · Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Full text of the Supreme Court of India's judgmentChecked against the originalFree to read
🔖 Save this judgment📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

LexStreak turns the Supreme Court's output into a five-minute daily read for advocates — plain-language headnotes, the questions each judgment settles, and the full text when you need it.

🔖Save judgments into folders you actually use
📚A daily feed curated to your practice areas
🔥A reading streak, and your place on the Bar leaderboard
Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Full judgment
1.

Delay in filing the instant matter is condoned, subject to the appellants depositing a sum of Rs.25000/- towards costs for the respondents. The amount be handed over to the respondents within three weeks from today; and the amount shall be recovered from the concerned officials who are responsible for causing delay in the instant matter.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 29.05.2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dismissing Writ Petition (Civil) No.4859 of 2017.

4.

The aforestated writ petition was filed by the appellants challenging the view taken by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, allowing Original Application No.4320 of 2014 preferred by the respondents herein on the basis of LARSGESS Scheme floated by the Indian Railways.

5.

The aforestated Scheme was adversely commented upon by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in its judgment dated 27.04.2016 in CWP No.7714 of 2016. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom was dismissed by this Court, whereafter the Scheme itself was terminated by Union of India on 05.10.2019.

6.

Thereafter, various petitions came up before this Court including Writ Petition (Civil) No.1407 of 2019 and Writ Petition (Civil) No.78 of 2021. This Court has since then consistently refused to accept, acknowledge and uphold any right flowing from the provisions of the Scheme.

7.

Viewed thus, the Tribunal was not justified in passing directions in the instant matter and the High Court was in error in rejecting the challenge raised by the appellants.

8.

We, therefore, allow this appeal, set-aside the view taken by the Tribunal and the High Court and dismiss Original Application No.4320 of 2014.

9.

This appeal is thus allowed with no order as to costs. …………………….…………………….J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ……………………..……………………J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT) ……………………..……………………J. (PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA) New Delhi April 05, 2022

What the Court decided this week

ABHAY JAIN versus THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ANR

2022 INSC 309 · Supreme Court of India

V NAGARAJAN versus SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD.& ORS.

2021 INSC 663 · Supreme Court of India

SWAMINATHAN & ORS. versus ALANKAMONY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2022 INSC 283 · Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court decides something every day. Read one a day.

A free account gets you the day's judgments in your practice areas, a reading streak, and folders to keep what matters.

Start reading free
Source: Supreme Court of India. Reproduced for open access to public legal records, as issued — we add no masking of our own.
Headnote and questions prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk · Report an error · Privacy