Can a Court in writ jurisdiction order admission to an undergraduate course without an assessment of merit, course requirements and seat availability?

Constitution of India — Art.226 — Education — CBSE Senior School Certificate Examination — Subject sequence in the List of Candidates — Sixth (additional) subject — Undergraduate admission — Error acknowledged by the school — Reasoned reconsideration — Education — Undergraduate admission — Rejection for ineligible subject group — Representation pointing to a school error — Held: The University was entitled to use the CBSE mark statement for initial screening, but once a specific representation identified a possible error in the school's entry and referred to the school's acknowledgment, a final decision on that representation required consideration of those materials. (¶26) Education — CBSE record — Correction of subject sequence — Effect of the school's acknowledgment — Held further: A later acknowledgment by the school cannot by itself alter CBSE's final record or set aside the University's published admission condition excluding additional subjects; both the contemporaneous records and the school's explanation must be examined together. P.C. Akash v. Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, distinguished. (¶17, 27, 30, 31) Constitution of India — Art.226 — Relief — Direction to admit — Held further: The Court cannot order admission without an assessment of merit, course requirements and seat availability; the appropriate course is time-bound directions to the school, CBSE and the University. Writ petition disposed of. (¶32, 33, 39)