LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 28 February 2023

Can a Governor defer summoning the Budget Session in order to take legal advice on the Chief Minister's communications?

STATE OF PUNJAB v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2023 INSC 181 · Writ Petition (Civil) No 302 of 2023
Coram: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art.174 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. There is no occasion to seek legal advice on whether or not the Budget Session of the Legislative Assembly should be convened. Whatever the tenor of the Chief Minister's communications, the Governor remains plainly bound by the advice tendered to him by the Council of Ministers.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Art.174 — Art.167 — Art.32 — Governor — Summoning of the Legislative Assembly — Aid and advice of the Council of Ministers — Duty of the Chief Minister to furnish information — Constitutional functionaries — Constitution of India — Art.174 — Summoning the House — no discretion in the Governor — Held: The authority entrusted to the Governor to summon the House of the Legislature of the State is to be exercised on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and is not a constitutional arena in which the Governor is entitled to exercise his own discretion. (¶22) Constitution of India — Art.174(1) — legal advice no answer to the Cabinet's advice — Held further: There is no occasion to seek legal advice on whether or not the Budget Session of the Legislative Assembly should be convened; once the Council of Ministers has tendered its advice, the Governor is plainly bound by it. (¶23) Constitution of India — Art.167(b) — Chief Minister's duty to furnish information — Held further: Once the Governor calls for information relating to the administration of the affairs of the State and proposals for legislation, the Chief Minister is duty bound to furnish it, and withholding it is plainly in dereliction of that constitutional duty. (¶24) Constitution of India — Art.167 — Art.174 — obligations of constitutional functionaries are not reciprocal conditions — Held further: The failure of a constitutional authority to fulfil its obligation under a distinct provision furnishes no justification to another to decline to fulfil its own, and constitutional discourse must be conducted with a sense of decorum and mature statesmanship. Petition disposed of. (¶25, 27)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 23While responding to the request by the Council of Ministers for summoning the House, the communication of the Governor dated 23 February 2023 referred to the Cabinet decision. However, the Governor also referred to the tweet of the Chief Minister and to his letter dated 14 February 2023 and then proceeded to state that since both the tweet and the letter were “patently unconstitutional” and “extremely derogatory”, he was compelled to take legal advice “on this issue” and that he would decide on the request thereafter. There was no occasion to seek legal advice on whether or not the Budget Session of the Legislative Assembly should be convened. The Governor was plainly bound by the advice tendered to him by the Council of Ministers.
Acts & Sections
Art.174 Constitution of IndiaArt.167 Constitution of IndiaArt.32 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of STATE OF PUNJAB v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB & ANR. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under Article 174 of the Constitution, must the Governor summon the State Legislative Assembly on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers?Under Article 167 of the Constitution, is the Chief Minister bound to furnish information called for by the Governor?Does one constitutional authority's failure to perform its duty justify another in declining to perform its own?Why does Article 167 require the Chief Minister to furnish information to the Governor?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections