LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 20 July 2026

Can a mortgage be redeemed before the period stipulated in the deed has run?

Joice v. Paulraj
S.A.Nos.725 & 1335 of 2003 · S.A.Nos.725 & 1335 of 2003
Coram: Justice R.Poornima
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.62 Transfer of Property Act, 1…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Yes, as a general rule. A mortgage is redeemable even before the expiry of the stipulated period unless there is a valid statutory restriction or an express covenant creating a legally enforceable bar. The mortgagor's right of redemption is a substantive statutory right protected under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and any contractual term which completely prevents or unreasonably restricts its exercise amounts to a clog on the equity of redemption and is unenforceable.

Headnote

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — s.62 — Usufructuary mortgage — Redemption — Clog on the equity of redemption — Indian Succession Act, 1925 — s.33 — Sreedhana — Partition — Moulding of relief — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Redemption before the stipulated period — Clog on the equity of redemption — Held: A mortgage is redeemable even before the stipulated period expires unless a statutory restriction or an express enforceable covenant bars it; a term that prevents or unreasonably restricts redemption is a clog on the equity of redemption and unenforceable. (¶18) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — s.62 — Usufructuary mortgage — No reimbursement for improvements — Held further: A usufructuary mortgagee holds possession and appropriates the rents and profits in lieu of interest; without an express covenant he cannot demand the value of improvements as a condition precedent to redemption. (¶22) Indian Succession Act, 1925 — s.33 — Sreedhana is not a partition of the daughter's inheritance — Held further: A gift of Sreedhana at marriage is neither partition nor relinquishment and cannot curtail a daughter's statutory right to succeed; among Christians the widow takes one-third and the lineal descendants two-thirds equally. (¶26, ¶29) Partition — Candour as to assets and liabilities — Relief to be moulded — Held further: A plaintiff seeking partition must disclose the estate's liabilities as well as its assets, and a court finding an entitlement smaller than claimed should mould the relief rather than dismiss the suit. Appeal partly allowed. (¶28, ¶33)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 18It is not in dispute that the suit property originally belonged to Sathyanesan, the father of the plaintiff and that the mortgage in question is a usufructuary mortgage. As a general rule, a mortgage is redeemable even before the expiry of the stipulated period, unless there is a valid statutory restriction or an express covenant creating a legally enforceable bar. The mortgagor’s right of redemption is a substantive statutory right protected under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Any contractual term which completely prevents or unreasonably restricts the exercise of such right amounts to a clog on the equity of redemption and is unenforceable.
Paragraph 19In the present case, the defendants have failed to establish that the mortgage deed contains any such valid covenant postponing or restricting the plaintiff’s right of redemption.. Therefore, the contention that the suit for redemption was premature cannot be accepted.
Acts & Sections
s.62 Transfer of Property Act, 1882s.33 Indian Succession Act, 1925Tamil Nadu Agriculturist Debt Relief Act

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Joice v. Paulraj — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can a usufructuary mortgagee insist on payment for improvements before parting with possession?Does property given to a daughter as Sreedhana at her marriage exhaust her share in her father's estate?How does an estate devolve among Christians where the deceased leaves a widow and children?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections