Can findings in an interim order be treated as final during the same proceeding?

No. The findings in an interim order are interim for a reason, and the plain and simple reason is that such findings are not based on full analysis of facts and evidence. If an interim order is supposed to be treated as binding in a permanent sense and is not to be questioned in the course of a proceeding, it ceases to be an interim order and assumes finality. Where the order was passed without prejudice to a party’s rights, that party cannot be faulted for seeking to revisit it.

National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — s.15 — s.17(3) — Restoration and rehabilitation distinguished — Polluter pays principle — No fault liability — Causal link — Interim order — National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — s.15 — Restoration is not rehabilitation — Held: Rehabilitation means complete reparation so that the affected area becomes fully functional, while restoration means bringing it back to its original state regardless of how optimum that state was. Section 15 permits restitution or restoration; ordering rehabilitation exceeds that jurisdiction. (¶46, 47) Environmental law — Polluter pays principle — Causal link with the alleged polluter — Held further: The principle is contingent upon the causation of real damage and a causal link between the actions of the project proponent and the degradation. The alleged person must be a polluter before being held absolutely liable in law. (¶53) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — s.17(3) — No fault applies to an accident — Held further: Sub-section (3) of Section 17 specifically applies to the case of an accident, the word referring to cases involving hazards such as a gas leak. It cannot found liability where no accident is in question. (¶52) Practice and procedure — Findings in an interim order — Without prejudice order — Held further: Findings in an interim order are interim because they rest on no full analysis of facts and evidence; treated as permanently binding, the order ceases to be interim and assumes finality. Impugned judgment set aside. (¶34)

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Vyakti Vikas Kendra, India v. Manoj Misra (Dead) & Ors — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India