LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 30 July 2026

Can part-time service be counted as qualifying service for pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978?

The State of Tamil Nadu v. M.Narayannan
WA No. 2801 of 2025 · WA No. 2801 of 2025
Coram: Justice S.M.Subramaniam · Justice N.Senthilkumar
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow r.11(2) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. Rule 11 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 stipulates counting 50% of temporary service along with the actual period of regular service, but in unambiguous terms reiterates that the benefit is to be extended to employees employed in a whole-time job and not in a part-time job. Part-Time Panchayat Clerks later absorbed as Junior Assistants therefore cannot have 50% of their part-time service reckoned as qualifying service.

Headnote

Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.11(2), r.11(4) — Constitution of India — Art.14 — Part-time service — Qualifying service for pension — Status as precedent — Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.11 — Counting 50% of temporary service — whole-time job only — Held: The benefit of counting 50% of temporary service as qualifying service is confined by Rule 11 to an employee employed in a whole-time job, and is not available for a part-time job. (¶6) Constitution of India — Art.14 — Orders contrary to the Rules — loss of status as precedent — Held further: Article 14 cannot be invoked for perpetuating illegality, and orders running counter to Rule 11(2) and 11(4) lose their status as precedent. Writ appeal allowed. (¶6, 7)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 6A batch of writ appeals were filed by the State in State of Tamil Nadu and Others -vs- A.Chidambaram (2026/MHC/2486) wherein the rightfulness of the claim made by the Part- Time Panchayat Clerks in the context of the Rules and with reference to the Full Bench was examined and the said batch of writ appeals were disposed of by this Court by a detailed order dated 23.06.2026. The relevant portion of the order reads as under:
Acts & Sections
r.11(2) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978r.11(4) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978Art.14 Constitution of IndiaClause 15 Letters Patent

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of The State of Tamil Nadu v. M.Narayannan — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can an order running counter to the Pension Rules be followed as precedent in later cases?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections