LexStreak
Read free →
Madras High Court· 25 September 2026

Does a recognised CBSE academic subject become one of lesser academic standard merely because of its sixth position in the List of Candidates?

Malar S v. The Central Board of Secondary Education
WP(MD).22492/2026 · 2026:MHC:3938 · WP(MD) NO. 22492 of 2026
Coram: Justice L.Victoria Gowri
🔖 Save this judgment📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

A recognised CBSE academic subject does not become one of lesser academic standard merely because of its sixth position.

No. A recognised CBSE academic subject does not become one of lesser academic standard merely because of its sixth position. CBSE's additional affidavit confirmed that a recognised academic subject entered sixth carries the same syllabus and assessment as when entered among the first five, and the marks awarded for it are marks earned in a CBSE examination. Under CBSE's scheme the sixth registered subject is nevertheless an additional subject, and its treatment for eligibility and ranking in a particular undergraduate admission process is governed by the rules applicable to that process.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Art.226 — Education — CBSE Senior School Certificate Examination — Subject sequence in the List of Candidates — Sixth (additional) subject — Academic standard — Correction after declaration of results — Undergraduate admission — Error acknowledged by the school — Education — CBSE — Sixth subject — Academic standard of the subject — Held: A recognised CBSE academic subject studied, examined and passed does not become a subject of a lesser academic standard merely because it appears in the sixth position in the List of Candidates or mark statement; its treatment for eligibility and ranking in a particular admission process is governed by the rules of that process. (¶21, 31) Education — Undergraduate admission — Declaration of subjects passed — Admission brochure — Held further: Where an applicable brochure expressly excludes an additional subject from eligibility or ranking, a declaration that the student studied and passed that subject cannot by itself amend the brochure or compel admission. P.C. Akash v. Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, distinguished on the voluntary-selection finding. (¶26, 27) Education — CBSE record — Rearrangement of registered subject sequence after results — Held further: A request to rearrange the first five subjects and the sixth after declaration of results must be considered by CBSE with reference to the individual records and its applicable rules; the Court directed individual statements from the school and a time-bound decision by CBSE. Writ petition disposed of. (¶29, 30, 31, 33)

Headnote

You've used your free headnotes this month

The answer above and the Court's own paragraphs stay free. LexStreak's full headnote on this judgment needs an account — a free one opens it again.

Create my free account
In the Court's own words
Paragraph 20Two propositions must be kept distinct. Under CBSE’s scheme, chronological order has a defined consequence. The first five registered subjects are main subjects and the sixth is an additional subject. The Board is therefore correct in submitting that the existing mark statements reflect the sequence in the List of Candidates furnished to it.
Paragraph 21The sixth position does not mean that the student did not study the subject. CBSE’s additional affidavit expressly confirms that a recognised academic subject entered sixth carries the same syllabus and assessment as that subject when entered among the first five. The marks awarded for it are marks earned in a CBSE examination. This Court records that clarification, which applies to each petitioner’s child according to the subject actually studied, examined and passed.
Paragraph 31Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following declaration and directions:

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Malar S v. The Central Board of Secondary Education — and get the Madras High Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can a declaration that a student studied and passed a subject by itself amend an admission brochure or compel admission where the brochure excludes additional subjects?Must a request to rearrange the registered subject sequence after declaration of results be considered by CBSE with reference to individual records?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections