LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 22 July 2026

Does a rule counting half of an employee's temporary service towards pension extend to part-time service?

The District Collector Villupuram, Villupuram District – 605 602 v. N.Baskar
WA No.2070 of 2026 · WA No.2070 of 2026
Coram: Justice S.M.Subramaniam · Justice N.Senthilkumar
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow r.11 Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. Rule 11 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 is a welfare provision counting 50% of temporary service along with the actual period of regular service, and in unambiguous terms confines that benefit to an employee employed in a whole-time job. It cannot be used as a ladder to claim the counting of the full period of temporary service, nor extended to part-time employment such as that of a Part-Time Panchayat Clerk.

Headnote

Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.11 — r.11(2) — r.11(4) — Part-time service — Counting of 50% of temporary service — Constitution of India — Art.14 — Precedent — Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.11 — Benefit confined to whole-time service — Held: Rule 11 counts half of temporary service only for an employee in a whole-time job, not for part-time service; pension, though a right, operates within the scheme the Rules frame. (¶2) Constitution of India — Art.14 — A wrong order is not a precedent to be repeated — Held further: Article 14 cannot be invoked to perpetuate an illegality, and orders running counter to Rule 11(2) and 11(4) and to the Full Bench lose their status as precedent. Appeal allowed. (¶2, ¶3)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 2The learned Government Counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that in similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this Court, examined the claim of similarly placed persons and on the scope of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 and the principles settled by the Full Benches, passed a common judgment, vide judgment dated 23.06.2026 in W.A.No.1569 of 2026 etc. batch. The relevant portion of the said judgment reads as under:
Acts & Sections
r.11 Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978r.11(2) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978r.11(4) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978Art.14 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of The District Collector Villupuram, Villupuram District – 605 602 v. N.Baskar — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can Article 14 of the Constitution of India be invoked to have an earlier erroneous order repeated in a later case?What becomes of judicial orders that run counter to a statutory Rule and to a Full Bench decision?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections