LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 30 July 2026

Does K.A.Annamma permit a Shops and Establishments Act appeal by a co-operative society employee?

The Management/President, Southern Railway Employees' Consumer Co-operative Stores Limited v. The Appellate Authority under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act
W.P(MD)No.2081 of 2024 · W.P(MD)No.2081 of 2024
Coram: Justice M.Dhandapani
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.4(1)(f) Tamil Nadu Shops and E…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. Reliance on K.A.Annamma v. Secretary, Cochin Cooperative Hospital Society Limited is misconceived. That decision arose in a different statutory context, namely industrial disputes, and does not dilute the exemption contained in Section 4(1)(f) for establishments governed by a separate law in force.

Headnote

Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 — s.4(1)(f) — s.41 — Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act — s.153 — Exemption where a separate law governs — Jurisdiction of the Appellate Authority — Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 — s.4(1)(f) — Scope of a general welfare legislation — Held: The Act is welfare legislation regulating conditions of work, and s.4 consciously excludes establishments whose service conditions are governed by a separate law in force. It creates no parallel disciplinary code overriding a special statute. (¶2, 10) Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act — Special Bye-laws — A complete code for service conditions — Held further: The Co-operative Societies Act, its Rules and the approved Special Bye-laws constitute a complete code governing a society's service conditions. The s.4(1)(f) exemption applies and the s.41 appellate remedy is inapplicable. (¶10) Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 — s.41 — Appellate Authority without jurisdiction — Held further: The Appellate Authority accordingly lacked jurisdiction to entertain a dismissed society employee's appeal, and reliance on K.A.Annamma is misconceived, that decision having arisen in a different statutory context. Writ petition allowed. (¶10, 11)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 7In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the decision in K.A.Annamma's case is distinguishable and applies only in the context of industrial disputes. The very same judgment was considered by the Division Bench of this Court, which, after an elaborate discussion, held that the Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act has no jurisdiction in matters concerning employees of Co-operative Societies whose service conditions are governed by the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, the Rules and the Special Bye-laws.
Paragraph 10This Court is of the considered view that the impugned order cannot be sustained. The Preamble to the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act makes it clear that the enactment is a general welfare legislation intended to regulate the conditions of work in shops and commercial establishments. Simultaneously, the Legislature, by incorporating Section 4, has consciously excluded certain establishments from the purview of the Act. In particular, Section 4(1)(f) exempts establishments whose service conditions are governed by a separate law in force. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No.707 of 2026 has categorically held that the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, the Rules framed thereunder and the approved Special Bye-laws constitute a complete code governing the service conditions of employees of Co-operative Societies and therefore, the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, including the appellate remedy under Section 41, are inapplicable. Admittedly, the petitioner Society is governed by the said statutory framework. Hence, the Appellate Authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeals. The reliance placed on K.A.Annamma is misconceived, as the said decision arose in a different statutory context and does not dilute the exemption contained in Section 4(1)(f). Accordingly, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside.
Acts & Sections
s.4(1)(f) Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947s.41 Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947s.153 Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of The Management/President, Southern Railway Employees' Consumer Co-operative Stores Limited v. The Appellate Authority under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Whether an employee of a Co-operative Society governed by the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act can invoke the appellate remedy under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act?Does the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act create a disciplinary code overriding a special statute?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections