Does the onus lie on the insurer to prove that the driver had no valid driving licence and that policy conditions were breached?
Coram: Justice M.Jothiraman
The onus lies on the insurer to prove that the driver had no valid driving licence and that policy conditions were breached.
Yes. The onus lies on the insurer to prove that the driver had no valid driving licence and that policy conditions were breached. Where the driver did not possess a valid driving licence and there is a breach of policy conditions, pay and recover can be ordered in cases of third-party risks.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s.61 — s.66 — Third-party claim — Fundamental breach of policy conditions — Pay and recover — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s.147 — Third-party risk — Pay and recover — Held: An insurer must satisfy a third-party award first and recover from the insured, the principle of pay and recover applying even where a fundamental breach of policy conditions is proved. (¶14) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s.61 — Unregistered trailer — Liability of the tractor's insurer — Held further: The insurer of a tractor is liable for third-party compensation though an unregistered trailer was attached to it, the trailer having no independent motor of its own. (¶14) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s.149 — Driving licence — Onus on the insurer — Held further: The onus lies on the insurer to prove that the driver held no valid driving licence and that policy conditions were breached. Appeal partly allowed. (¶13, 15)
Headnote
You've used your free headnotes this month
The answer above and the Court's own paragraphs stay free. LexStreak's full headnote on this judgment needs an account — a free one opens it again.
Create my free accountOne judgment a day. That's the whole habit.
Read the full text of HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. P.ANILKUMAR — and get the Madras High Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.
Create my free accountFree forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India