LexStreak
Read free →
Madras High Court· 31 August 2026

Is a second wife whose marriage is void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 a widow entitled to family pension?

THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) v. S. THAMIZHARASI
WA.3444/2023 · 2026:MHC:3657 · WA No. 3444 of 2023
Coram: Justice S. M. Subramaniam · Justice Krishnaswamy Govindarajan
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow r.49(7)(a)(i) Tamil Nadu Pension…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

A second wife whose marriage is void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not a widow entitled to family pension.

No. A second wife whose marriage is void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not a widow entitled to family pension. Payability arises only if the applicant is a widow, and the status of widow arises only from a valid marriage. Here the deceased Government servant's first marriage had been dissolved only by a registered mutual agreement, which is no divorce under the Act, so the second marriage was null and void.

Headnote

Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.49(7)(a)(i) — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — ss.5(i), 11 — Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 — r.19 — Family pension — Second wife — Status of widow — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — ss.5(i), 11 — Void second marriage — No status of widow — Held: A second marriage solemnised while the first subsists is null and void, and a mutual agreement of separation registered under the Registration Act is no valid divorce; the second wife therefore holds no status as widow. (¶13, 3) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.49(7)(a)(i) — Payability precedes sharing — Held further: Rule 49(7)(a)(i) governs the sharing of family pension where it is payable to more widows than one; it does not sanction family pension to a second wife whose marriage was not solemnised in accordance with law. (¶12, 15) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 — r.49(7)(a)(i) — Sharing confined to pre-1955 marriages — Held further: The sharing provision was framed for second marriages solemnised before the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, when they were valid; a wife married after it, second marriage then being misconduct and an offence, cannot take advantage of it. Writ appeal allowed. (¶14)

Headnote

You've used your free headnotes this month

The answer above and the Court's own paragraphs stay free. LexStreak's full headnote on this judgment needs an account — a free one opens it again.

Create my free account
In the Court's own words
Paragraph 13Question of 'payability' would arise only if the applicant is the widow. The question of widow would arise only if the marriage is a valid marriage. Based on an invalid marriage, the second wife cannot claim the status as “widow”. When admittedly, the applicant is the second wife of the deceased employee and she is not a widow, then the family pension is not payable and the question of invoking Rule 49(7)(a)(i) would not arise.
Acts & Sections
r.49(7)(a)(i) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978r.3(1)(e) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978s.5(i) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.11 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955r.19 Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) v. S. THAMIZHARASI — and get the Madras High Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Does Rule 49(7)(a)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 sanction family pension to a second wife?Does the sharing of family pension between widows apply only where the second marriage was solemnised before the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 came into force?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections