LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 06 April 2026

Is access to clean drinking water part of the right to life under Article 21?

In Re: 2 Million Lives at Risk, Contamination in Jojari River, Rajasthan
2026 INSC 316
Coram: Sandeep Mehta; Vikram Nath
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art.21 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Yes. The right to access clean drinking water is an integral facet of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and cannot be compromised on account of administrative inaction or environmental neglect. The State is under a constitutional obligation to restore contaminated water sources, prevent further pollution of groundwater and make adequate arrangements for the supply of potable water.

Headnote

Constitution of India - Art. 21 - Environmental degradation - River pollution - Right to clean drinking water - Polluter Pays principle - Institutional accountability - Constitution of India - Art. 21 - Access to safe drinking water - Held: The right to access clean drinking water is an integral facet of the right to life under Article 21 and cannot be compromised on account of administrative inaction or environmental neglect. The State bears a constitutional obligation to restore contaminated sources. (¶52) Constitution of India - Art. 21 - Interim directions as constitutional mandate - Held further: Directions to arrest river pollution are not mere regulatory or administrative measures. They emanate from the constitutional mandate to enforce the right to life, which includes access to clean water, a pollution-free environment and human dignity. (¶56) Environmental degradation - Concealment before the Oversight Committee - Rule of law - Held further: Levelling a riverbed, raising earthen bunds and withholding a facility from inspection to present a sanitised picture cannot be brushed aside as incidental. Such conduct erodes institutional accountability and undermines the rule of law. (¶43, 44) Polluter Pays principle - Environmental compensation - Defaulting industrial units - Held further: Where land allotted for a common effluent treatment plant lies idle and untreated effluent persists, the Board must penalise defaulting member units under the Polluter Pays principle. Interim directions issued; further status report called for. (¶48, 55)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 52In view of the aforesaid, it is incumbent upon the State to ensure the availability of safe and potable drinking water to the affected population. The right to access clean drinking water is an integral facet of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and cannot be compromised on account of administrative inaction or environmental neglect. The State is, therefore, under a constitutional obligation to take immediate and effective measures to restore contaminated water sources, prevent further pollution of groundwater, and make adequate and sustainable arrangements for the supply of potable water to the affected areas, so as to safeguard public health and uphold the fundamental rights of the residents.
Acts & Sections
Art.21 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of In Re: 2 Million Lives at Risk, Contamination in Jojari River, Rajasthan — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Are court directions to stop river pollution merely regulatory, or a constitutional mandate under Article 21?Can concealing environmental violations before the High-Level Ecosystem Oversight Committee be treated as incidental?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections