Is property purchased with the proceeds of sale of ancestral property ancestral property?

Property — Ancestral property — Purchase from sale proceeds of ancestral property — Suit for bare injunction — Denial of title — Decree obtained by fraud — Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order XXIII Rule 3A — Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s.44 — Property — Character of the property purchased — Held: Property purchased with the proceeds of sale of ancestral property is ancestral property. (¶22) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Suit for bare injunction — Denial of title — Held further: A suit for bare injunction is maintainable despite denial of title where the question of title is simple and not complicated, and only a complicated question of title requires the parties to be relegated to a suit for declaration. (¶25) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order XXIII Rule 3A — Memo not signed by both parties — Held further: Order XXIII Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not bar a suit where the memo is not signed by both parties. (¶33) Evidence — Decree obtained by fraud — Indian Evidence Act, 1872, s.44 — Held further: A decree obtained by fraud can be challenged at any time, even in collateral proceedings, fraud vitiating all solemn acts. (¶34) Second appeals allowed in part; suit remanded. (¶35)