LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 24 July 2026

Is the framing of Rules a precondition to collecting a lifetime tax that a statutory Schedule already quantifies?

V.Krishnamurthy v. The State of Tamil Nadu
WA No. 192 of 2026 · WA No. 192 of 2026
Coram: Justice N.Mala · Justice G.Jayachandran
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.3 Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Ta…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. Where the Schedule determines the tax by reference to the cost and the age of the vehicle, it is self-contained and constitutes sufficient statutory guidance, making the framing of Rules wholly unnecessary. In any event the existing Taxation Rules prescribe the mode of payment of tax, the authority competent to fix it, the form of licence, the period within which it is to be paid and the penalty for non-payment.

Headnote

Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 — s.4(1) — s.4(1-A) — Eighth Schedule — Lifetime tax — Rules not a precondition — Double taxation — Mandamus — Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 — Eighth Schedule — Rules not a precondition to the levy — Held: The Schedule fixing lifetime tax by the cost and the age of the vehicle is self-contained and constitutes sufficient statutory guidance, so framing fresh Rules is unnecessary; the existing Taxation Rules in any event prescribe the mode of payment and the competent authority. (¶25) Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 — s.4(1) — s.4(1-A) — Prescription not to be imported — Held further: Sub-section (1-A) contains no requirement of prescription by Rules, unlike sub-section (1), and that requirement cannot be imported into it; the provisions on quarterly and half-yearly payment have no bearing on a one-time lifetime tax. (¶26) Mandamus — Vires unchallenged — No direction to refrain from enforcing a law — Held further: So long as a statutory provision stands unchallenged and holds the field, no writ can restrain the authorities from discharging the duties it casts upon them; such a prayer is misconceived. (¶16) Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 — Double taxation — Credit for tax already paid — Held further: Where only the difference is collected after crediting the tax already paid under the earlier regime, the plea of double taxation does not arise. Appeal dismissed. (¶28, ¶29)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 25Upon a reading and analysis of the above Schedule, we are of the view that the Schedule is self-contained and constitutes sufficient statutory guidance for the levy of the lifetime tax, requiring the framing of Rules wholly unnecessary. Further, it is not as if no Rules are in existence. The Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1974, are still in existence and the Rules framed thereunder, prescribe for the mode of payment of tax, the authority competent to fix the tax, recording a Certificate of Registration, form of licence, period within which the tax has to be paid and penalty for non-payment. We therefore find no substance in the contention of the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant that in the absence of Rules, the levy of lifetime tax under amended provisions is unenforceable.
Acts & Sections
s.3 Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974s.4(1) Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974s.4(1-A) Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974Eighth Schedule Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1974

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of V.Krishnamurthy v. The State of Tamil Nadu — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can a requirement that tax be paid in the manner prescribed by Rules, appearing in one sub-section, be read into another sub-section that does not contain it?Can a writ of mandamus restrain authorities from enforcing a statute whose validity has not been challenged?Does converting a periodic vehicle tax into a lifetime tax amount to double taxation?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections