LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 02 January 2025

May a High Court interfere with a criminal investigation before the police report is submitted under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

Kim Wansoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
2025 INSC 8 · Criminal Appeal (@ SLP (Crl.) No.4849 of 2020)
Coram: C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art.226 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Yes. The High Court could interfere with the investigation if non-interference would result in miscarriage of justice.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Art.226 — Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.482 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss.406, 420, 120-B — Quashing of FIR — Investigation stage — Vague allegations — Abuse of process of law — Constitution of India — Art.226 — Quashing of FIR not confined to s.482 — Held: Quashing of criminal proceedings is normally sought in exercise of the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. That does not mean it cannot be done in invocation of the extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution. (¶6) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.482 — Interference at the investigation stage — Held further: The High Court may interfere with an investigation where non-interference would result in miscarriage of justice, and may quash an FIR which discloses no offence without anything being added to or subtracted from its recitals. (¶8, 9) Constitution of India — Art.226 — Material beyond the averments in the FIR — Held further: The Court is not confined to the averments in the FIR when ascertaining whether the ingredients of the alleged offence are disclosed. It owes a duty to look into the other attending circumstances emerging from the record and to read in between the lines. (¶11) Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss.406, 420, 120-B — Vague allegations — Abuse of process — Held further: Where, besides vague allegations, the recitals even if taken as true disclose no offence against an accused, asking him to stand the trial is an abuse of process of law. FIR and further proceedings quashed qua the appellant; appeal allowed. (¶13, 14)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 8In regard to quashing of criminal proceedings at the investigation stage itself, this Court in Eastern Spg. Mills v. Rajiv Poddar[^3], held that the High Court could interfere with the investigation, if non-interference would result in miscarriage of justice.
Acts & Sections
Art.226 Constitution of Indias.482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s.406 Indian Penal Code, 1860s.420 Indian Penal Code, 1860s.120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860s.91 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s.173(2) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Kim Wansoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under the Constitution of India, may a High Court quash an FIR in exercise of the extraordinary power under Article 226, or is quashing confined to the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?In what categories of cases may a High Court exercise the power under Article 226 of the Constitution or Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash criminal proceedings?When may an FIR itself be quashed on the ground that it discloses no offence?When deciding a petition to quash under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or Article 226 of the Constitution, is the Court confined to the averments made in the FIR or complaint?What is the significance, for quashing under Article 226 of the Constitution, of an FIR whose own recitals ask the police to help the complainant recover an amount?When does requiring an accused to stand trial on such an FIR amount to an abuse of process of law?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections