Must land be allotted before a project proponent applies in Form 1 for environmental clearance?
Coram: Justice J.B. Pardiwala · Justice Manoj Misra
No. Clause 6 of the EIA, 2006 permits a Form 1 application after the identification of prospective site(s); a credible document showing the intent of the land owners to sell the land becomes necessary only at the stage of appraisal.
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 — s.8 — Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016 — EIA, 2006 — Revised Guidelines, 2016 — Publication of guidelines — Land requirement — Terms of Reference — Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 — s.8 — Publication of guidelines — Official Gazette not a sine qua non — Held: Guidelines issued under a statutory power do not lose their mandatory character for want of publication in the Official Gazette where neither the parent statute nor the rules prescribe a mode of publication. A reasonable mode, such as the official website, is sufficient. (¶50, 54) Revised Guidelines, 2016 — Clause 7 — Relaxation of land requirement — Held further: The one-acre land requirement for a common bio-medical waste treatment facility may be relaxed only for land within municipal limits of over 25 lakh population or in a rural area, and only in consultation with the CPCB with additional control measures. (¶57, 62) EIA, 2006 — Clause 6 — Form 1 application — Land allotment not a condition precedent — Held further: An application in Form 1 may be made after the identification of prospective site(s); land allotment is not a condition precedent either for that application or for the grant of a Consent to Establish. (¶70, 89) EIA, 2006 — Terms of Reference — Effect of an environmental clearance being set aside — Held further: Setting aside an environmental clearance does not, as a mechanical rule, invalidate the Terms of Reference on which it was granted. Appeal allowed; the impugned judgment set aside. (¶95, 108, 112)
Headnote
You've used your free headnotes this month
The answer above and the Court's own paragraphs stay free. LexStreak's full headnote on this judgment needs an account — a free one opens it again.
Create my free accountOne judgment a day. That's the whole habit.
Read the full text of M/S PUNAHCHAKRAN PRIVATE LIMITED v. INDOTECH WASTE SOLUTION & ORS — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.
Create my free accountFree forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India