LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 20 May 2025

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, what turns on the difference between ‘allowing’ a deduction and ‘computation’ of a deduction when Sub-section (9) of Section 80-IA is applied?

Shital Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax
2025 INSC 743 · CIVIL APPEAL NO.14318 OF 2015
Coram: Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.80-IA(9) Income Tax Act, 1961📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

The two have separate and distinct meanings. Computation of deduction is a stage prior and helps in quantifying the amount which is eligible for deduction. Sub-section (9) of Section 80-IA does not bar the deduction allowed under Section 80-IA from being included in the gross total income when the deduction under Section 80-HHC(3) is computed, because the expression ‘shall not be allowed’ cannot be equated with ‘shall not qualify’ — an expression the legislature used in Sections 80-HHB(5) and 80-HHD(7) but not here.

Headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961 — s.80-IA(9) — s.80-HHC — s.80-IB — Chapter VI-A, heading ‘C’ — Deductions — Computation of deduction and allowing a deduction distinguished — Reference answered — Income Tax Act, 1961 — s.80-IA(9) — Restriction on allowance, not on computation — Held: On a plain reading, Sub-section (9) of Section 80-IA restricts the deduction allowable under any other provision under heading ‘C’ to the extent already claimed and allowed under Section 80-IA. The restriction is not on computing the total gross income. (¶20, 21) Income Tax Act, 1961 — s.80-IA(9) — s.80-HHC — Computation of deduction unaffected — Held further: Allowing a deduction and computation of deduction have separate and distinct meanings. Gross total income for computing the deduction under Section 80-HHC is not reduced by the Section 80-IA deduction, though the aggregate cannot exceed the profits and gains of such eligible business. (¶21, 23) Income Tax Act, 1961 — s.80-IA(9) — Conflicting High Court views — Reference answered — Held further: The interpretation made by the Bombay High Court in Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. is logical and correct. The reference is answered accordingly and the appeals directed to be placed before the appropriate Bench. (¶24, 25)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 23Hence, we find that the view taken by the Bombay High Court is correct. Dipak Misra, J (as he then was), in paragraphs 47 and 48 of the decision in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. Micro Labs Limited[^1] approved the view taken by Bombay High Court in the aforesaid case. Paragraphs 47 and 48 read thus:
Acts & Sections
s.80-IA(9) Income Tax Act, 1961s.80-HHC Income Tax Act, 1961s.80-IB Income Tax Act, 1961s.80-AB Income Tax Act, 1961s.80-A Income Tax Act, 1961s.147 Income Tax Act, 1961s.4 Income Tax Act, 1961

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Shital Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, where a deduction has been claimed and allowed under Section 80-IA, does Sub-section (9) of Section 80-IA reduce the gross total income for computing a deduction under Section 80-HHC, or does it only restrict what may be allowed?Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is there a ceiling on the aggregate of deductions claimed under Section 80-IA and under other provisions under heading ‘C’ of Chapter VI-A?Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, what was the object of enacting Sub-section (9) of Section 80-IA with effect from 1st April, 1999?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections