LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 21 July 2026

What is a Magistrate's duty when two final reports arising from a case and its counter case are placed before him?

Uthanduraj v. State of Tamil Nadu
Crl.OP.(MD)No.1615 of 2026 · Crl.OP.(MD)No.1615 of 2026
Coram: Justice R.Vijayakumar
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.296(b) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

To scrutinise them carefully. Where the reports put forward inconsistent rival versions of the same incident — so that if one version is true the other must necessarily be false — or where the officer has filed two reports mechanically without properly investigating and finding the true aggressor, the Magistrate shall return the final reports and direct him to come up with a definitive case. Cognizance of both may be taken only after a factual finding that both parties engaged in acts of aggression.

Headnote

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s.296(b) — s.115(2) — s.351(2) — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s.528 — Case and counter case — Two final reports — PSO 566 — Case and counter case — Two final reports — Reasons must be assigned in both — Held: Where the investigating officer cannot find the real aggressor, or finds both parties aggressors, he may file a final report in each case; but proper reasons must be assigned, and must appear in both reports. (¶13, ¶18) Case and counter case — Duty of the Magistrate — Final reports to be returned — Held further: The Magistrate must scrutinise both final reports and, where they are inconsistent rival versions or filed mechanically without finding the true aggressor, return them and direct the officer to come up with a definitive case. (¶12, ¶14) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s.528 — Cognizance taken inadvertently set aside — Held further: Where cognizance has been taken inadvertently on both reports and trial has not begun, the order may be set aside under s.528 with a direction to follow PSO 566. Cognizance in both cases set aside. (¶15, ¶20) Case and counter case — Fate of the rival complaint to be stated — Held further: Even where a single final report is filed, it must state the fate of the rival complaint, so that the trial court can scrutinise it or await the protest petition. (¶18)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 12For better appreciation, paragraph Nos.58(A)(b)(v) and 58 (B)(a)
Paragraph 16The Magistrate can taken cognizance of both the final reports which are rival versions of the same incident, only after he arrives at a factual findings that both the parties have engaged in the act of aggression. In the present case, there is no such factual finding on the part of the Judicial Magistrate while taking cognizance in S.T.C.No.983 of 2025.
Acts & Sections
s.296(b) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023s.115(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023s.351(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023s.528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023PSO 566

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Uthanduraj v. State of Tamil Nadu — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
When may an investigating officer file two final reports in a case and counter case, and what must he record?What is the remedy where cognizance has been taken inadvertently on two final reports in a case and counter case?Must a final report disclose the fate of the rival complaint even where only one report is filed?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections