LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 03 September 2026

What probative value do pre-constitutional family records carry in verifying a Scheduled Tribe claim?

SHIRISH PANDHARINATH PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
2026 INSC 949 · SLP (C) NO. 12938 OF 2020
Coram: Justice Aravind Kumar · Justice Vipul M. Pancholi
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art.142 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

High probative value. The pre-constitutional records of the grandfather and father recorded their caste as ‘Koli’, and relying on those records the claim of belonging to the ‘Tokre Koli’ Scheduled Tribe was rejected. This Court found no error in the conclusion reached by the Scrutiny Committee and affirmed by the High Court, which also accepted the finding that a Caste Validity Certificate granted to a cousin had been obtained by misrepresentation.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Art.142 — Scheduled Tribe certificate — Caste Scrutiny Committee — Invalidation of tribe claim — Protection of retiral and pensionary benefits — Constitution of India — Art.142 — Invalidated tribe claim — Complete justice in exceptional circumstances — Held: Invalidation of a caste or tribe claim upon verification ordinarily has consequences in law, but in exceptional circumstances where the equities of the case so warrant the power under Article 142 may be exercised to do complete justice. (¶13) Constitution of India — Art.142 — Long service ending in superannuation — Retiral benefits protected — Held further: Where the individual concerned served for more than three decades and retired on superannuation during the pendency of the appeal, the service rendered is protected for the limited purpose of computation and release of retiral and pensionary benefits. (¶14) Constitution of India — Art.142 — Scope of the protection — No validation of the tribe claim — Held further: Such protection does not amount to validation or recognition of the tribe claim, and neither the individual nor any member of the family may claim any future benefit on the basis of the invalidated caste certificate. (¶15) Scheduled Tribe certificate — Pre-constitutional family records — High probative value — Disposal — On facts, held: Pre-constitutional records of the grandfather and father recording the caste as ‘Koli’ possess high probative value, and the claim to the ‘Tokre Koli’ Scheduled Tribe stands rejected. Appeal allowed only as to retiral benefits; the invalidation is not interfered with. (¶7, 16)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 7Vide the impugned judgment and order dated 15.09.2020 passed in Writ Petition (St.) No. 92659 of 2020, the High Court declined to interfere with the order of the Scrutiny Committee and dismissed the writ petition, holding that the appellant had been afforded sufficient opportunity during the prolonged proceedings and that rejection of the adjournment application dated 02.01.2020 had neither caused prejudice nor resulted in violation of the principles of natural justice. On merits, relying upon the pre-constitutional records of the grandfather and father of the appellant, wherein their caste was recorded as “Koli”, the High Court held that such records possessed high probative value and rejected the claim of the appellant of belonging to the “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe. The High Court also accepted the finding of the Scrutiny Committee that the Caste Validity Certificate granted to the cousin of the appellant, Vinod G. Sonavane, had been obtained by misrepresentation. Accordingly, finding no reason to interfere with the order dated 27.07.2020 passed by the Scrutiny Committee, the High Court dismissed the writ petition.
Paragraph 11We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, considered the rival submissions, examined the material placed on record and perused the order dated 27.07.2020 of the Scrutiny Committee as well as the impugned judgment dated 15.09.2020 passed by the High Court. We find no error in the conclusion reached by the Scrutiny Committee and affirmed by the High Court in the impugned judgment.
Acts & Sections
Art.142 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of SHIRISH PANDHARINATH PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can the Court protect retiral benefits under Article 142 after a caste certificate is invalidated?Does protection of pensionary benefits amount to validation of the invalidated tribe claim?Is refusal of an adjournment by a Caste Scrutiny Committee a violation of natural justice where the proceedings were prolonged?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections