LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 17 March 2025

When a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution raises an issue of public importance that turns on policy, will the Supreme Court issue mandatory directions?

SIDDHARTH DALMIA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 351 · WRIT PETITION (C) No. 337 of 2018
Coram: Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art.32 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Not ordinarily. Where the issues, though of paramount public importance, primarily involve policy decisions, the policy-makers are the best equipped to take a holistic view and formulate the guidelines as may be required. The Court held it may not be advisable to issue mandatory directions which may hamper the growth of hospitals in the private sector, while still finding it necessary to sensitize the State Governments about unreasonable charges and exploitation of patients.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Arts. 21, 32, 38, 39, 47 — List II (State List) — Public health — Private hospitals — Pricing of drugs — Policy decisions — Judicial restraint — Constitution of India — Art. 32 — Policy decisions — Scope for mandatory directions — Held: Issues of paramount public importance that primarily involve policy decisions are for the policy-makers, who are best equipped to take a holistic view and formulate the guidelines; mandatory directions that would hamper the growth of hospitals in the private sector are not advisable. (¶15, 17) Constitution of India — Art. 21, Part IV — Medical facilities — Right to life — Held further: Provision of medical facilities to one and all is an essential component of the right to life, and where the requisite medical infrastructure falls short of the population the States have themselves facilitated private entities and look to them. (¶13) Constitution of India — List II (State List) — Public health and hospitals — State competence — Held further: Public health and sanitation, hospitals and dispensaries fall in the State List, so regulation of this kind must come from the State Governments keeping their local conditions in mind; writ petition disposed of with a direction to consider the issue. (¶16, 18)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 15All these issues are undoubtedly of paramount public importance. It, however, seems to us that such issues primarily involve policy decisions, for which the policy-makers are the best equipped to take a holistic view and formulate the guidelines as may be required, to safeguard the patients or their attendants from exploitation while simultaneously, ensuring that there is no discouragement and unreasonable restriction on private entities from entering the health sector.
Paragraph 17To sum up, it may not be advisable for this Court to issue mandatory directions which may hamper the growth of hospitals in the private sector; but parallelly, it is necessary to sensitize the State Governments re: the problem of unreasonable charges and exploitation of patients in private hospitals.
Acts & Sections
Art.32 Constitution of IndiaArt.21 Constitution of IndiaArts.38, 39 and 47 Constitution of IndiaDrugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940Essential Commodities Act, 1955

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of SIDDHARTH DALMIA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Is the provision of medical facilities part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution?Under the Constitution of India, which government is competent to regulate the pricing practices of private hospitals?What competing consideration limits regulation of private hospitals under a right-to-health claim?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections