LexStreakRead free →
Madras High Court· 24 July 2026

When does the clause ignoring earlier promotions to grades that now carry the same grade pay apply?

The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem v. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai
2026:MHC:3177 · WP NOS.33823, 27433 & 30026 OF 2023
Coram: Justice S.M.Subramaniam · Justice N.Senthilkumar · Justice N. Senthilkumar
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Clause (1) Modified Assured Care…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Only where a pay anomaly has arisen. Clause (5) addresses the situation in which a revision of pay scales pursuant to the Sixth Pay Commission left the employee in the same grade pay with no upward monetary benefit — that is, anomalies arising from the merger of pay scales or the upgradation of posts. It does not apply in the ordinary case where upgradations fall due under Clause (1) on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years.

Headnote

Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme — Clause (1) — Clause (5) — Financial upgradation — Pay anomalies — Prospective operation — Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme — Clause (1) — Upgradation on 10, 20 and 30 years from the entry grade — Held: The Scheme provides three financial upgradations counted from the direct entry grade on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years, and an upgradation is admissible whenever an employee has spent ten years continuously in the same grade pay. (¶11, ¶13) Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme — Clause (5) — Confined to pay anomalies — Held further: Clause (5), which ignores earlier promotions to grades now carrying the same grade pay, addresses anomalies arising from merger of scales or upgradation of posts; it does not apply where upgradations fall due under Clause (1). (¶15, ¶16, ¶17) Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme — Prospective operation — No benefit before the Scheme existed — Held further: A scheme operates prospectively from the date it came into force, and no benefit can be claimed for years in which it did not exist; the third upgradation runs ten years from the accepted date of the second. Petitions allowed. (¶24, ¶26, ¶27)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 15Clause (5) clarifies that promotions earned or upgradations granted under the ACP Scheme in the past to those grades that now carry the same grade pay due to merger of pay scale or Page No.9 of 16 WP NOS.33823, 27433 & 30026 OF 2023 upgradation of posts recommended by the Sixth Pay Commission shall be ignored for the purpose of granting upgradations.
Paragraph 16The primary purpose of Clause (5) is to address the situation, where the revision of pay scales pursuant to the Sixth Pay Commission, if resulted in same grade pay leading to no upward monetary benefits, then such merger of pay scales or upgradation of posts recommended by the pay commission shall be ignored.
Paragraph 17However, the said circumstances typically arises in the event of pay anomalies, rather than in normal cases, where the upgradations are granted as per Clause (1) on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years. In other words, Clause (5) is applicable only in the event of pay anomalies, but not otherwise. Pay anomalies arouse on account of merger of scales or upgradation of posts.
Acts & Sections
Clause (1) Modified Assured Career Progression SchemeClause (5) Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem v. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
From what point are the three financial upgradations under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme counted?Can an employee claim the benefit of a career-progression scheme for a period before the scheme came into force?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections