LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 17 August 2026

Where an FIR is registered for an electoral offence, within what time must the investigation be completed?

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR v. PRATHIK PARASRAMPURIA
2026 INSC 868 · SLP (Crl.) No. 3549 of 2016
Coram: Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Art. 324 Constitution of India📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

The Investigation Officer entrusted with the investigation shall make every possible endeavour to complete investigations within a year, from the date of registration; if this timeline is exceeded, reasons therefor shall be recorded and communicated to the Election Commission of India. The investigating officer shall also submit a quarterly status report regarding the investigation to the EC through the Nodal Officer, after due approval of the Senior Superintendent of Police or the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the concerned district. The under investigation tag can not be allowed to hang endlessly upon the heads of individuals.

Headnote

Constitution of India — Art. 324 — Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.321 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss.171E, 188 — Representation of the People Act, 1951 — elections — black money — electoral offences — seizure of cash — withdrawal of cases — Constitution of India — Art. 324 — Election Commission — powers wide but not plenary — Held: Article 324 vests superintendence, direction and control of elections in the Election Commission; that power is wide but not plenary and operates only where the field is unoccupied by legislation. Controlling black money in the electoral process is one of its responsibilities. (¶10, 12) Constitution of India — Art. 324 — seizure of cash — reasons to be reduced in writing — Held further: On a seizure of cash or other assets, the suspicion of commission of crime and the likeliness of the material being used for untoward purposes must be reduced in writing, and the seizure reported within 24 hours. (¶17, 18) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.321 — withdrawal of cases — approval of the concerned High Court — Held further: A case arising from an electoral offence is not to be withdrawn as the norm; for candidates in a particular election cycle the approval of the concerned High Court is mandatory, a change in political dispensation being no ground. (¶17, 18) Constitution of India — Art. 324 — investigation and prosecution — completion within a year, designated courts — Held further: An investigation into an electoral offence must be completed within a year, with reasons recorded and a quarterly status report to the Election Commission where that timeline is exceeded; High Courts may designate courts for prompt hearing and disposal. Directions issued. (¶17, 18)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 17Let us now, in the light of the above discussion, examine each of these suggestions.
Paragraph 18Keeping in view the above, i.e., the discussion made above, reference to case laws, the detailed affidavits of the parties, and the submission of the learned amici, this Court issues the following directions: a. When a seizure of cash or other assets takes place, the authority affecting the seizure, must, within 24 hours, report the same to the District Magistrate/Additional District Magistrate/Court having competent jurisdiction along with written reasons disclosing the prima facie nexus between the cash or other asset seized and the suspected electoral offence. b. When FIRs are registered, the Investigation Officer (IO) entrusted with the investigation thereof shall make every possible endeavour to complete investigations thereinto, within a year, from the date of registration. If this timeline is exceeded, reasons therefor shall be recorded and communicated to the Election Commission of India; c. The investigating officer shall submit a quarterly status report regarding the investigation to the EC through the Nodal Officer, after due approval of the Senior Superintendent of Police/the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the concerned district; d. When Static Surveillance Teams (SST) during checks find money in excess of Rs. 10 lacs, information about the same shall be forwarded to the income tax authorities. e. All endeavours ought to be made for expeditious disposal of cases against candidates/sitting MPs/MLAs keeping in view the recurrent nature of elections. For this purpose, it is directed that the High Courts may, by following respective procedures, designate courts for the purposes of prompt hearing and disposal of such cases. f. For withdrawal of cases against candidates in a particular election cycle, the approval of the concerned High Court is mandatory in view of K.Ajith (supra) and Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay (supra). g. The affidavit of the EC that details the number of cases pending in connection with the Lok Sabha (2024) and Assembly elections (2019-25), shows quite a large percentage of pendency. The concerned courts should make all efforts to take the cases to the logical conclusion with utmost expedition.
Acts & Sections
Art. 324 Constitution of Indias.321 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973ss.171E, 188 Indian Penal Code, 1860Representation of the People Act, 1951ss.170, 173 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023Art. 136 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR v. PRATHIK PARASRAMPURIA — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under Article 324 of the Constitution of India, are the powers of the Election Commission plenary, or do they operate only where the field is unoccupied by legislation?When a flying squad or the Static Surveillance Teams seize cash during an election, must the reasons for the seizure be reduced in writing?Under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, may a case against a candidate be withdrawn in a particular election cycle without the approval of the High Court?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections