LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 30 April 2026

Can the Supreme Court exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to set aside a registered conveyance deed and order restitution when the underlying land acquisition has lapsed?

RELIANCE EMINENT TRADING AND COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2026 INSC 436 · Special Leave Petition (C) No. 22100 of 2025
Coram: J.K. Maheshwari
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Order XIII-A, Code of Civil Proc…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Yes. To do complete justice under Article 142, the Court set aside the registered Conveyance Deed and directed refund of the entire consideration with interest reduced to 7.5% per annum, achieving mutual restitution between the parties.

Headnote

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order XIII-A — Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Summary judgment — Fair Compensation Act, 2013 — s.24(2) — Lapse of acquisition — Refund — Article 142 — Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order XIII-A r.3 — 'real prospect of success' test — Held: Order XIII-A permits summary judgment only where a party has no real prospect of succeeding or defending a claim. The standard demands a likelihood that is real and substantial, not merely fanciful or arguable. (¶43, 51) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order XIII-A — nine-point guideline — no mini-trial — Held further: A court must ask whether either side lacks a real prospect of success without conducting a mini-trial, weighing evidence reasonably expected at trial. Nine non-exhaustive guidelines were laid down, urging courts to 'grasp the nettle' on neat points of law. (¶56, 59) Fair Compensation Act, 2013 — s.24(2) — lapse — possession not sine qua non for refund — Held further: Once the acquisition underlying the plot had lapsed under Section 24(2) with finality after dismissal of review and curative petitions, possession was not sine qua non for refund. Both the Authority's possession-based defence and its limitation plea were fanciful, raising no triable issue. (¶64, 66) Constitution of India, Art. 142 — restitution — refund with interest — conveyance deed set aside — Held further: Since the acquisition had lapsed with finality, the Court invoked Article 142 to set aside the registered Conveyance Deed and ordered refund of the entire consideration with interest reduced to 7.5% per annum. The appeal was allowed and the suit decreed accordingly. (¶80, 83)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 80Consequentially, it is necessary that this Court set aside the registered Conveyance Deed dated 06.02.2008 to do complete justice, by exercising power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, as mutual restitution would be necessary to bring an end to this dispute once and for all. Accordingly, the registered Conveyance deed dated 06.02.2008, duly registered at the office of Sub-Registrar-VII Delhi having Registration No. 4300 in Additional Book No. 1 Volume 2886 at Pg. 83 to 86 dated 07.03.2006, executed by the respondent in favour of appellant herein is set aside.
Paragraph 83Keeping in view the aforesaid findings and mandate of law, the present appeal is allowed, however there shall be no order as to costs. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in the above terms. The Registry of this Court is directed to draw up the decree in the above terms. ….…………………………J. [J.K. Maheshwari] ….…………………………J. [Atul S. Chandurkar] New Delhi; 29 th April, 2026
Acts & Sections
Order XIII-A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Commercial Courts Act, 2015)s.24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013Art. 142 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of RELIANCE EMINENT TRADING AND COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, what standard must a court apply before granting summary judgment in a commercial suit?Once a land acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Fair Compensation Act, 2013 with finality, is the auction purchaser's possession of the land sine qua non for refund of the sale consideration?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections