Does an intention to strike terror by using explosive substances against places of worship amount to a terrorist act under Section 15?

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — ss.15, 16, 18, 38, 39, 43D(5) — Bail — Prima facie true — Logistical support — Terror conspiracy — Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — s.43D(5) — Bail — Reasonable grounds for believing the accusation prima facie true — Held: Where the material prima facie shows that the accused was part of the conspiracy and supplied the vehicle used in the blast, the bar on bail operates. (¶30, 36) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — s.39 — Support to a terrorist organisation — Membership not required — Held further: Absence of material showing membership of a proscribed organisation does not displace s.39, which is attracted by support in the form of logistical assistance. (¶37) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — s.15 — Terrorist act — Intention to strike terror — Held further: An intention to re-create an earlier bomb blast and to attack places of worship falls prima facie within a terrorist act. Appeal dismissed. (¶34, 44)