LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 24 August 2026

Does the user of the land or the classification of the area determine the industrial rate under Circular No.2/2004?

Harinder Singh Sodhi v. State of Rajasthan and Ors
2026 INSC 922 · Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.36745 of 2025
Coram: Justice J. B. Pardiwala · Justice K. Vinod Chandran
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

The user. The circular, insofar as valuation of industrial land, specifies the user and not the classification of the area: if at the time of execution of the document the land is being put to industrial use or is situated in a RIICO Industrial Area or has been converted to industrial purpose, it shall be valued at the industrial rate. The High Court's test — that the property be situated in the industrial area and the work performed be exclusively of manufacturing — does not come out from the circular.

Headnote

Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Factories Act, 1948 — Gift deed — Stamp duty — Valuation — Industrial user distinguished from commercial user — Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Valuation of land — User, not classification — Held: The user to which the land is put determines valuation; sale of the manufactured items, even retail sale, does not make the premises commercial as distinguished from industrial. (¶7, 8) Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Circular No.2/2004 — Test stipulated by the High Court — Held further: The test that the land be situated in the industrial area and the work performed be exclusively of manufacturing does not come out from the circular. Appeal allowed. (¶9, 10)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 8The circular, insofar as valuation of industrial land, specifies the user and not the classification of the area. The circular requires that at the time of execution of the document, if the land is being put to industrial use or is situated in a RIICO Industrial Area or has been converted to industrial purpose, then it shall be valued at the industrial rate. Hence, our finding, that the user determines the valuation of the land, as distinguished from the classification, even as per the Master Plan as submitted by the learned Government Advocate.
Paragraph 9The High Court clearly erred in stipulating a test which does not come out from the circular of the State Government providing for valuation of different properties, specifically of industrial, residential and commercial properties.
Acts & Sections
Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998Factories Act, 1948

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Harinder Singh Sodhi v. State of Rajasthan and Ors — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Whether the property which was subject of a gift deed should be considered to be an 'industrial' property or a 'commercial' property for the purposes of computing the duty under the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections