Does the user of the land or the classification of the area determine the industrial rate under Circular No.2/2004?
Coram: Justice J. B. Pardiwala · Justice K. Vinod Chandran
The user. The circular, insofar as valuation of industrial land, specifies the user and not the classification of the area: if at the time of execution of the document the land is being put to industrial use or is situated in a RIICO Industrial Area or has been converted to industrial purpose, it shall be valued at the industrial rate. The High Court's test — that the property be situated in the industrial area and the work performed be exclusively of manufacturing — does not come out from the circular.
Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Factories Act, 1948 — Gift deed — Stamp duty — Valuation — Industrial user distinguished from commercial user — Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Valuation of land — User, not classification — Held: The user to which the land is put determines valuation; sale of the manufactured items, even retail sale, does not make the premises commercial as distinguished from industrial. (¶7, 8) Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 — Circular No.2/2004 — Test stipulated by the High Court — Held further: The test that the land be situated in the industrial area and the work performed be exclusively of manufacturing does not come out from the circular. Appeal allowed. (¶9, 10)
One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.
Read the full text of Harinder Singh Sodhi v. State of Rajasthan and Ors — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.
Create my free accountFree forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India