LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 18 August 2025

Is mens rea for abetment of suicide to be gleaned from what goes on in the mind of the victim, or from the intention of the accused?

Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
2025 INSC 990 · Criminal Appeal Nos. 2177-2185 of 2024
Coram: B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.306 Indian Penal Code, 1860📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

From the accused. Mens rea cannot be gleaned merely by what goes on in the mind of the victim; what constitutes mens rea is the intention and purpose of the alleged perpetrator as discernible from the conscious acts or words and the attendant circumstances. However harsh or severe the harassment, unless there is a conscious deliberate intention to drive another person to suicidal death, there cannot be a finding of abetment under Section 306.

Headnote

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s.306 — s.107 — Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s.113A — s.113B — Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.482 — Abetment of suicide — Proximate trigger — Mens rea — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s.306 — Abetment of suicide — Proximate prior act required — Held: Even where harassment is constant and continued over a long period, a proximate prior act must be found before the suicide can be treated as its direct consequence. Continuous harassment alone cannot establish a positive instigation constituting abetment. (¶22) Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s.107 — Mens rea — Intention of the accused, not the victim’s mind — Held further: Mens rea is the intention and purpose of the alleged perpetrator, discernible from conscious acts or words — not what goes on in the mind of the victim. Without a conscious deliberate intention, however harsh the harassment, there is no abetment. (¶23) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s.113A — s.113B — Statutory presumptions — Proximate trigger confirmed — Held further: The presumptions aiding Sections 498A and 304B were enacted carefully incorporating the requirement of a proximate trigger, which therefore cannot be absent for abetment. Where the suicide note is suspect and no proximate trigger appears, quashing is right; appeals dismissed. (¶25, 28, 40)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 23The victim may have felt that there was no alternative or option, but to take his life, because of what another person did or said; which cannot lead to a finding of mens rea and resultant abetment on that other person. What constitutes mens rea is the intention and purpose of the alleged perpetrator as discernible from the conscious acts or words and the attendant circumstances, which in all probability could lead to such an end. The real intention of the accused and whether he intended by his action to at least possibly drive the victim to suicide, is the sure test. Did the thought of goading the victim to suicide occur in the mind of the accused or whether it can be inferred from the facts and circumstances arising in the case, as the true test of mens rea would depend on the facts of each case. The social status, the community setting, the relationship between the parties and other myriad factors would distinguish one case from another. However harsh or severe the harassment, unless there is a conscious deliberate intention, mens rea, to drive another person to suicidal death, there cannot be a finding of abetment under Section 306.
Acts & Sections
s.306 Indian Penal Code, 1860s.107 Indian Penal Code, 1860s.482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s.113A Indian Evidence Act, 1872s.113B Indian Evidence Act, 1872s.304B Indian Penal Code, 1860s.498A Indian Penal Code, 1860s.108 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023s.45 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Whether continuous acts of ill-treatment, harassment and defamation would lead to a charge of abetment under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, if the person at the receiving end commits suicide?Do the statutory presumptions in Sections 113A and 113B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 show that a proximate trigger is required for abetment of suicide?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections