Madras High Court· 19 August 2026

May a single provision of a statute be construed in isolation from the rest of the enactment?

S.RANI v. SAMPATH

CMA.4025/2019 · 2026:MHC:3584 · CMA No. 4025 of 2019
Coram: Justice P.T. Asha · Justice N. Mala

🔖 Save this judgment 🔔 Follow s.2 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 📬 Get today's judgments

View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.

Answer

No. An independent provision cannot be read in isolation from the rest of the statute. The preamble, the related provisions and the scheme of the Act as a whole must be considered to determine the real intent of the statute, the preamble being the key to open the mind of the makers of the legislation.

Headnote

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — ss.2, 5, 7, 9 — Restitution of conjugal rights — Applicability of the Act — Marriage between a Christian and a Hindu — Interpretation of a provision in the scheme of the Act — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s.9 — a valid marriage under the Act is a condition precedent — Held: To maintain a petition under Section 9 for restitution of conjugal rights, a valid marriage governed by the Hindu Marriage Act must first be established. Where one of the parties is a Christian by religion and does not fall within any of the explanations to Section 2, the marriage is not one to which the Act applies, and a petition under Section 9 is not maintainable. (¶13, 26) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s.9 — a provision cannot be read in isolation from the scheme of the Act — Held further: An independent provision of law cannot be read in isolation from the rest of the statute. For interpreting a particular provision the preamble, the related provisions and the scheme of the Act as a whole must be considered to determine the real intent of the statute; the preamble is the key to open the mind of the makers of the legislation. (¶21, 23) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s.9 — the common nouns "husband" and "wife" do not extend the Act to non-Hindus — Held further: Although Section 9 employs the common nouns "husband" and "wife" without the prefix "Hindu", it cannot on that account be held to apply to non-Hindus. The scheme of the Act, as established from its preamble and provisions, cannot be overridden by the mere use of common nouns in a single section, and to read Section 9 otherwise would isolate it from the rest of the Act. Appeal dismissed. (¶24, 25, 27)

In the Court's own words

Paragraph 21The preamble as is well known is the key to open the minds of the Makers of the legislation. The preamble is a part of the Act which throws light on the intent and design of the Act and indicates the purpose, scheme and scope of the Act. Upon a reading of the preamble of the Hindu Marriage Act, it is clear that the purpose or object of the Act, is to codify the law relating to Marriages between Hindus. The intent of the statute spoken through the preamble makes it clear that it applies to Hindu marriages. Section 2 speaks of the applicability of the Act and lays down that any person who is a Hindu by religion or born in Hindu family with Hindu father and mother, in any of its forms such as Virashaivas, lingayats or a follower of Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj or any person who is a Buddhist, Jain or Sikh is also a Hindu by religion. Thus, any person except a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew is a Hindu. The explanation expands the applicability of the Act to persons mentioned therein. Section 5 lays down the conditions for a valid Hindu marriage. Section 5 clearly provides that a valid Hindu marriage is one which is solemnised between two Hindus subject to conditions laid down therein being fulfilled. Section 7 speaks of ceremonies of marriage and states that if the ceremonies include the saptapadi, on completion of the 7th step the Marriage becomes complete and binding.

Paragraph 23It is trite that in legal interpretation of statutes an independent provision of law cannot be read in isolation to the rest of the statute. For interpreting a particular provision, the Preamble of the Act, related provisions and the scheme of the Act as a whole have to be considered, to determine the real intent of the statute.

Acts & Sections

s.2 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.5 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.7 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.7A Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.9 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of S.RANI v. SAMPATH — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment

Is a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights maintainable where one of the parties is not a Hindu?Does the use of the common nouns "husband" and "wife" in a section, without the prefix "Hindu", extend that section to persons outside the Act?

Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Madras High Court. Corrections