LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 10 August 2026

Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, are Provident Fund and ESPP deductions treated as compulsory deductions while computing a spouse’s net disposable income for maintenance?

HARPREET SAWHNEY v. PUNEET SHARMA
2026 INSC 822 · Civil Appeal Nos. [not yet numbered] of 2026 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.31815-31816 of 2025)
Coram: Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh; Sanjay Karol
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act, …📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. Provident Fund and ESPP amounts are not compulsory deductions comparable to income tax or professional tax; they are not permanent charges but accrue to the depositor and can be withdrawn in the future, so they should not reduce the net disposable income used to compute maintenance.

Headnote

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — ss.24, 26 — Constitution of India — Article 136 — Child maintenance — Interim maintenance — Compulsory deductions — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Maintenance — Provident Fund and ESPP deductions not compulsory — Held: Deductions such as Provident Fund and ESPPs are not compulsory deductions for computing net disposable income for maintenance; unlike income tax and professional tax, they are not permanent charges but accrue to the depositor and can be withdrawn in the future. (¶20) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Interim maintenance enhanced for medical expenses — Held further: Interim maintenance towards the Appellant is enhanced to Rs.30,000 per month, particularly keeping in mind the medical expenses of her cancer treatment, since the final order omitted to mention the interim maintenance the High Court had earlier directed. (¶22) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Child maintenance enhanced — Held further: Monthly maintenance for both children is enhanced to a total of Rs.1,50,000 (Rs.75,000 per child) with effect from 1st January 2025, without precluding the Appellant from seeking further enhancement on a change in circumstances. (¶23) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Undertaking to transfer vehicle — Disposal — Held further: No further direction is required regarding transfer of the vehicle in view of the undertaking already given by the Respondent-husband, who must abide by it within three months; the Civil Appeals are disposed of accordingly. (¶24, 25)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 20We have considered the submissions of the Appellant that the deductions are voluntary in nature. We find that deductions of Provident Fund and ESPPs are ultimately benefits that would be passed on to the Respondent-husband. Unlike Income Tax payment or professional taxes which are mandatory taxes, PFs and ESPPs are not permanent charges but rather will accrue into the account of the Respondent-husband which can be withdrawn by the depositor in the future.
Acts & Sections
s.13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.26 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955s.151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908Article 136 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of HARPREET SAWHNEY v. PUNEET SHARMA — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Can interim personal maintenance for a spouse be enhanced during pending proceedings on account of a serious medical diagnosis?Does an order enhancing child maintenance preclude a party from seeking further enhancement later?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections