LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 09 February 2023

Under the Kerala Building Tax Act 1975, does the Explanation to Section 3(1) confine "charitable purpose" to relief of the poor and free medical relief?

M/S LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS v. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2023 INSC 720 · Civil Appeal No 6799 of 2017
Coram: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B Pardiwala
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.3(1) Kerala Building Tax Act, …📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

No. The Explanation uses the expression "includes", and when a statute uses that expression the elucidation is not intended to be exhaustive. Relief of the poor and free medical relief are therefore not exhaustive of the content of charitable purpose.

Headnote

Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — s.3(1)(b) — Explanation — Exemption — Charitable purpose — "includes" and "means" — Principal use — Precedent overruled — Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — Explanation — charitable purpose not exhaustive — Held: Where the Explanation says that "charitable purpose" includes relief of the poor and free medical relief, the expression is not confined to those two heads. When a statute uses the expression "includes", the elucidation is not intended to be exhaustive. (¶4) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — "include" conflated with "means" — earlier decision overruled — Held further: A construction that reads the Explanation as meaning that charitable purpose is only relief of the poor and free medical relief conflates the word "include" with "means". SH Medical Centre Hospital is overruled to that extent. (¶6, 10) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1)(b) — "principally" — dominant substantive use — Held further: The expression "principally" conveys that which is the dominant purpose, and principal use refers to the dominant substantive use as distinguished from an ancillary use; that interpretation does not call for interference. (¶9) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — decision resting on an overruled reading — remand — Held further: A High Court judgment which rests only on the overruled reading must be set aside and the writ appeal restored to its file, keeping the factual analysis open. Reference answered; appeal disposed of. (¶11, 12)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 4Clause (b) of sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Kerala Building Tax Act 1975 stipulates that nothing in the enactment shall apply to buildings used “principally for ... Charitable ... purposes”. The Explanation [now Explanation (1)] indicates that for the purpose of the sub-section ‘charitable purpose’ includes “relief of the poor and free medical relief”. Clearly, therefore, the Explanation indicates that the meaning of the expression ‘charitable purpose’ is not confined to relief of the poor and free medical relief as is evidenced by the use of the expression ‘includes’. When a statute uses the expression ‘includes’, it is a well settled principle of interpretation that the elucidation is not intended to be exhaustive.
Paragraph 7The two judge bench in SH Medical Centre Hospital (supra) conflated the use of the word ‘include’ with ‘means’. The Explanation to Section 3(1)(a) uses the expression ‘includes’. The plain intendment is that relief of the poor and free medical relief are not exhaustive of the content of charitable purpose.
Acts & Sections
s.3(1) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975s.3(1)(b) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of M/S LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS v. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
When a statute defines an expression using "includes" rather than "means", is the definition exhaustive?Under the Kerala Building Tax Act 1975, what does the requirement in Section 3(1)(b) that a building be used "principally" for a charitable purpose require?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections