LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 09 February 2023

Under the Kerala Building Tax Act 1975, what does the requirement in Section 3(1)(b) that a building be used "principally" for a charitable purpose require?

M/S LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS v. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2023 INSC 720 · Civil Appeal No 6799 of 2017
Coram: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J B Pardiwala
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.3(1) Kerala Building Tax Act, …📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

It requires that the charitable purpose be the dominant purpose. Principal use refers to the dominant substantive use as distinguished from an ancillary use, and the interpretation placed on that expression by the earlier Bench does not call for interference.

Headnote

Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — s.3(1)(b) — Explanation — Exemption — Charitable purpose — "includes" and "means" — Principal use — Precedent overruled — Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — Explanation — charitable purpose not exhaustive — Held: Where the Explanation says that "charitable purpose" includes relief of the poor and free medical relief, the expression is not confined to those two heads. When a statute uses the expression "includes", the elucidation is not intended to be exhaustive. (¶4) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — "include" conflated with "means" — earlier decision overruled — Held further: A construction that reads the Explanation as meaning that charitable purpose is only relief of the poor and free medical relief conflates the word "include" with "means". SH Medical Centre Hospital is overruled to that extent. (¶6, 10) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1)(b) — "principally" — dominant substantive use — Held further: The expression "principally" conveys that which is the dominant purpose, and principal use refers to the dominant substantive use as distinguished from an ancillary use; that interpretation does not call for interference. (¶9) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 — s.3(1) — decision resting on an overruled reading — remand — Held further: A High Court judgment which rests only on the overruled reading must be set aside and the writ appeal restored to its file, keeping the factual analysis open. Reference answered; appeal disposed of. (¶11, 12)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 9Undoubtedly, Section 3(1)(b) provides that nothing in the Act shall apply to buildings which are used ‘principally’ for specific purposes, including among them, ‘charitable purposes’. The expression “principally” conveys the meaning of that which is the dominant purpose. The interpretation placed by the two-Judge Bench on the expression “principally used for charitable purposes” does not call for interference in view of the statutory language used in Section 3(1). Principal use refers to the dominant substantive use as distinguished from an ancillary use.
Acts & Sections
s.3(1) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975s.3(1)(b) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of M/S LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS v. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under the Kerala Building Tax Act 1975, does the Explanation to Section 3(1) confine "charitable purpose" to relief of the poor and free medical relief?When a statute defines an expression using "includes" rather than "means", is the definition exhaustive?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections