LexStreakRead free →
Supreme Court of India· 18 February 2025

Must the appropriate Government record reasons while granting or rejecting a prayer for permanent remission under Section 432 of the CrPC, and must that order be communicated to the convict?

In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail
2025 INSC 239
Coram: Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan
🔖 Save this judgment🔔 Follow s.432 Code of Criminal Procedure…📬 Get today's judgments
View the original judgment PDFFree to read. To download it — or the LexStreak typeset copy with the headnote and Points of Law — create an account; downloads are part of the Pro plan.
Answer

Yes. The power affects the convict's liberty guaranteed under Article 21, so the requirement of recording reasons for granting or rejecting the prayer for permanent remission is read into Section 432 of the CrPC and Section 473 of the BNSS. Brief reasons sufficient to enable the convict to understand why his prayer was rejected must be recorded, the order must be communicated to him and he must be informed of his right to challenge it, and a copy must be provided immediately to the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority so that legal aid can be offered.

Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.432 — s.433-A — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s.473 — Constitution of India — Arts. 14, 21 — Permanent remission — Premature release — Conditions — Cancellation — Recording of reasons — Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.432 — Premature release — policy obliges consideration without application — Held: Where the appropriate Government has a policy laying down guidelines for premature release, it is obliged to consider the case of every eligible convict without any application; granting relief only to those who apply is discriminatory and arbitrary. (¶8, 21) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.432(1) — Conditional remission — conditions reasonable and capable of being performed — Held further: Conditions attached to permanent remission must be reasonable, capable of being complied with, and neither vague nor oppressive; they must keep the criminal tendencies of the convict in check and secure his rehabilitation in society. (¶13, 21) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.432(3) — Cancellation of remission — natural justice and brief reasons — Held further: Remission cannot be cancelled without a show cause notice, an opportunity of being heard and brief reasons; registration of a cognizable offence is not per se a ground, and a minor or trifling breach will not do. (¶14, 16) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s.432 — Constitution of India — Art. 21 — Reasons for grant or refusal — Held further: The requirement of recording brief reasons is read into Section 432, and the order must be communicated to the convict with information of his right to challenge it. States without a policy were directed to formulate one within two months. (¶17, 18, 21)

In the Court's own words
Paragraph 17The power to grant premature release must be exercised in a fair and reasonable manner. It affects the convict’s liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Therefore, the requirement of recording reasons either for granting or rejecting the prayer for permanent remission will have to be read into the provisions of Section 432 of the CrPC and Section 473 of the BNSS. Principles of natural justice must be read into the provisions of Section 432 of the CrPC. In any case, in the case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India[^5] in paragraph 222.8, this Court held that the reasons for grant or refusal of remission should be clearly delineated in the order. Therefore, the requirement to record reasons exists. Brief reasons must be recorded, which are sufficient to enable the convict to understand why his prayer for remission has been rejected. This enables him to challenge the order of rejection.
Paragraph 18Furthermore, it follows that the order passed by the appropriate Government of either granting or rejecting the prayer for remission must be communicated to the convict. If the prayer is refused, while providing a copy of the order to the convict, he must be informed that he has a right to challenge the order. A copy of the order rejecting the prayer must be immediately provided to the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority so that legal aid can be offered to the prisoner to challenge the order.
Acts & Sections
s.432 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s.473 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023s.433-A Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s.475 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023Art. 14 Constitution of IndiaArt. 21 Constitution of IndiaArt. 72 Constitution of IndiaArt. 161 Constitution of India

One judgment a day. That's the whole habit.

Read the full text of In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail — and get the Supreme Court's output as a five-minute daily read, with plain-language headnotes and the questions each judgment settles.

Create my free account

Free forever plan · 30 seconds · data stays in India

Open the full judgment →

Also decided in this judgment
Under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, must a convict or his relatives make an application for premature release where the appropriate Government has already framed a policy laying down eligibility for it?Under Section 432 of the CrPC, is the absence of any policy or Regulations governing premature release consistent with a fair and reasonable exercise of that power?Under sub-Section (1) of Section 432 of the CrPC, may the appropriate Government attach conditions to an order of permanent remission, and what must those conditions satisfy?Can an order granting permanent remission be cancelled under sub-section (3) of Section 432 of the CrPC without a show cause notice and an opportunity of being heard?Is the registration of a cognizable offence against a convict, by itself, a ground to cancel an order of remission under sub-section (3) of Section 432 of the CrPC?
Plain-language answer prepared by the LexStreak Editorial Desk — verify against the judgment. Source: Supreme Court of India. Corrections